Risk management

Golden rules

Discover the 7 Golden Rules that keep Clinitalk safe and effective

At Clinitalk, our 7 Golden Rules are designed to ensure the platform remains a safe and trusted educational resource. These principles guide us in achieving our core goal: stimulating critical thinking about action.

We promote critical thinking by highlighting actions and behaviours that appear to differ from established best practice. This approach encourages learners to reflect on the appropriateness of those actions.

The 7 Golden rules

Do not judge clinical decisions
1. Clinitalk is not a clinical decision-making tool. It must never state a clinical action is correct or incorrect.
Do not instruct users to act
1. Clinitalk must not direct users to take clinical actions. Instead, feedback should prompt reflection through open-ended questions. Example: “Would it have been relevant to ask about weight loss or night sweats in this case?”
Communicate uncertainty clearly.
1. Always inform users about the level of certainty. Use language such as “appears consistent with” rather than definitive statements like “is consistent with.”
Provide relevant references to trusted sources
1. Users should be assisted and encouraged to access guidance / source material through the provision of direct links to relevant content.
Frame feedback as a comparison to guidelines.
1. Feedback should highlight how user actions might differ from established guidelines. Example: 'Action x 'appears consistent' with guidance y. Action z was not found in our check of guidelines, was it appropriate'?'
Only provide feedback on supported topics.
1. Clinitalk should only offer feedback where there is reliable evidence or established best practice to reference.
Promote a culture of safe, licensed use
1. Clinitalk must encourage users to follow safe practice through clear messaging and consistent reminders. Example: "I am a tool for educational reflection only, AI can make mistakes and my feedback must not be used for clinical purposes."

‍