ℹ️ This is the case information for the doctor.
Name
Ricky White
Age
5 years old
Address
17 Oakridge Crescent
Social history
None
Past history
Investigation results
Medication
Booking note
Dad requests appointment about Ricky's behaviour.
ℹ️ This is the information for the person role playing the patient.
Name
Ricky White
Age
5 years old
Address
17 Oakridge Crescent
Social history
None
Past history
Medication
"I've come on to talk about my son Ricky – he’s not right, doc. He’s just always so hyper and doesn't listen. I really think something’s going on."
Background
Psychosocial background information:
Ideas (patient’s ideas about the cause):
Concerns (patient’s worries):
Expectations (patient’s expectations for consultation):
Family history:
ℹ️ To mark data gathering & diagnosis select from the descriptors below.
Positive descriptors
Negative descriptors
Data gathering was systematic and targeted ensuring patient safety.
Data gathering was incomplete, lacking structure and focus.
Information gathered placed the problem in its psychosocial context.
The social and psychological impact of the problem was not adequately determined.
The presence or absence of relevant red flags was established.
Fails to assess key information necessary to determine risk.
A working diagnosis was reached using a structured, evidence-based approach.
The evidence collected was inadequate to support the conclusions reached.
Uses an understanding of probability based on prevalence, incidence, and natural history to aid decision-making.
Choice of diagnosis and/or investigations does not reflect disease likelihood.
Revises hypotheses as necessary in light of additional information.
Rigid consulting with new information not adequately considered and integrated into the working diagnosis.
ℹ️ To mark clinical management & medical complexity select from the descriptors below.
Positive descriptors
Negative descriptors
Practises holistically, promoting health, and safeguarding:
Fails to safeguard patient welfare:
Manages uncertainty, including that experienced by the patient:
Struggles with uncertainty, leading to inconsistent decisions:
Tailors management options responsively according to circumstances, priorities and preferences:
Management options fail to adequately consider patient preference and circumstance:
Refers appropriately being mindful of resource:
Sends patients for specialist input unnecessarily:
Offers management options that are safe and appropriate:
Fails to provide appropriate and or safe management choices:
Empowers self-care and independence:
Management fails to foster self-care and patient involvement:
ℹ️ To mark relating to others select from the descriptors below.
Positive descriptors
Negative descriptors
Shows understanding of medical-legal principles and regulatory standards:
Fails to give appropriate regard to key legal aspects of consulting:
Explores the patient’s agenda, health beliefs and preferences:
Fails to recognise the patient's agenda and impact of the problem:
Recognises what matters to the patient and works collaboratively to enhance patient care:
Fails to work with the patient to plan care:
Demonstrates flexibility of communication adapting to the patient and scenario:
Consults rigidly, providing generic explanations and management plans:
Demonstrates an empathic approach, and a willingness to help and care for the patient:
Lacks empathy and fails to recognise emotional cues:
Respectfully challenges unhelpful health beliefs or behaviours:
Fails to maintain a productive therapeutic relationship:
ℹ️ Insights from the examiner
Case at a glance
Ricky is a 5-year-old child whose father is concerned about hyperactivity and possible ADHD. The concern appears to be mainly at home, with no similar concern reported from school or Ricky’s mother in the information provided.
The behaviour may have started or become more prominent after Ricky’s parents separated. The consultation should explore whether this is a neurodevelopmental concern, a situational response to family change, sleep-related behaviour, normal developmental variation, or another issue.
GP trainee performance focus
A strong GP trainee should demonstrate the ability to:
What this case is testing
Patient and parent priorities and concerns
Ricky’s father may be concerned about:
Central challenge
The central challenge is to avoid “solving the wrong problem”.
If Ricky’s behaviour is only occurring in one setting, especially after family separation, the immediate task is not to diagnose ADHD but to gather information, understand context and support the family.
Must-not-miss issue or diagnosis
The must-not-miss issue is assuming ADHD from behaviour in a single setting.
Under NICE NG87 principles, ADHD diagnosis should not be based on symptoms in one setting only. Symptoms need to:
Red flags or high-risk features
Look for:
Common GP trainee pitfalls
What good looks like
A strong consultation is curious, structured and non-judgemental. The trainee listens to the father’s concern, explores Ricky’s behaviour across settings, explains why more information is needed, and agrees a practical support plan.
“One of our goals should be to understand whether Ricky’s behaviour is happening in more than one setting, because that helps us decide if this could be ADHD or something different.”
Learner checkpoint
Have I worked out whether the concern is ADHD, family-stress-related behaviour, sleep-related behaviour or normal developmental variation before planning next steps?
Start with an open question
Begin with an open, purposeful question.
“Could you walk me through what concerns you most about Ricky’s behaviour at home and at school?”
This allows the father to describe the behaviour, his concern and his expectations.
Time-efficient data gathering
Use a structured approach:
Summarise early to ensure you are addressing the right problem:
“So just to summarise what I’ve heard so far… Ricky is active and struggles to focus at home, but there’s no similar concern from school or mum. This behaviour started after you and his mum separated, and it seems more prominent when he’s with you. Does that sound right?”
This helps:
High-yield questions
Behaviour pattern
Settings
Impact
Family context
Sleep and routine
Expectations
Functional, psychosocial or contextual assessment
Explore:
Be curious, not judgemental. Family structure, routines and stressors are often key to understanding child behaviour.
Explore ideas, concerns and expectations
If the father is seeking diagnosis or treatment:
“It sounds like you’re wondering whether this could be ADHD and whether Ricky needs a referral or medication. Is that right?”
Then explore:
Recognise and respond to cues
Important cues include:
Parental separation
This may contribute through stress, emotional insecurity, inconsistent routines or different discipline between homes.
Father wanting referral or medication
This may reflect frustration, stress or belief that a medical solution is needed.
Behaviour only happening at home
This is diagnostically important because ADHD should cause impairment in more than one setting.
Ricky’s mother not being involved
ADHD assessment needs input from both parents and school where possible.
Useful response:
“To get a full picture, we really need to understand how Ricky is in all the places he spends time — with you, with mum and at school.”
Useful consultation phrases
“ADHD stands for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. It can affect how a child concentrates, stays still and manages their impulses.”
“Children with ADHD are often more active than other children their age, can be more impulsive and may find it harder to focus on a task.”
“In ADHD, these behaviours usually need to happen in more than one place, like at home and at school, and they usually affect learning, relationships or daily routines.”
“Some children have lots of energy or are struggling with changes around them, like big changes at home or not getting enough sleep, and that can look similar to ADHD.”
“Getting more information will help us work out whether this is ADHD or something different.”
Consultation flow and signposting
Summarising and checking understanding
A helpful synthesis might be:
“From what you’ve told me, Ricky is very active and can struggle to focus when he is with you, but school has not raised concerns and we do not yet know whether mum is seeing the same pattern. This started after the separation, so we need to understand whether this is ADHD or a response to changes and routines.”
Check:
“Does that sound right? Is there anything important I’ve missed?”
Data gathering self-check
Before moving to management, the trainee should know:
Assessment domain mapping
Data gathering
Clinical management
Relating to others
Prioritised differential diagnosis or clinical reasoning
Appropriate differential, based on NICE NG87 and the case details:
Clinical reasoning script
“At Ricky’s age, lots of children are very active. ADHD is one possible explanation, but we usually need to see difficulties in more than one setting, such as home and school, and we also need to think about sleep, routines and family changes. Because this seems mainly at home so far, the next step is to gather more information before deciding whether this is ADHD.”
Red flags and risk assessment
Monitor for:
Decision points
Key decisions include:
Management priority
The management priority is to gather a fuller picture and support the family now, rather than jumping straight to diagnosis or medication.
Management options
1. Reassurance
Explain that many 5-year-olds are very active and this can be within normal development.
Avoid dismissing the father’s concern. Reassurance should be paired with a plan.
2. Gather information from Ricky’s mother and school
With appropriate consent, seek information from:
Example phrase:
“I’d like to get your agreement to talk to Ricky’s mum and his teachers so we can understand how he’s doing everywhere and decide together what might help.”
3. Behaviour and sleep diary
Encourage both parents to keep a diary of:
This may identify patterns or situational triggers.
4. Sleep hygiene advice
Discuss normal sleep patterns and practical sleep hygiene:
5. Parenting support
Signpost to parenting support programmes or local parenting classes.
These are first-line and recommended in NICE NG87 for primary-school-age children showing hyperactivity or behaviour difficulties.
6. School nurse or Early Help support
Consider:
7. Monitoring and follow-up
Arrange review in a few weeks to see whether the behaviour changes or persists and to review information from school and Ricky’s mother.
8. Safety-netting
Advise earlier review if:
Personalised plan
A plan tailored to this family might include:
Example phrase:
“It sounds like Ricky’s behaviour is mainly happening at home, and to get a full picture we really need input from both parents. How would you feel about us inviting mum to a future appointment so we can all look at this together?”
Shared decision-making
Agree shared goals with the father:
Ask:
“Does that make sense? Is there anything you’re worried we haven’t talked about?”
Safety-netting
Explain that the family should seek review earlier if:
Ethical, legal and safeguarding considerations
Consider:
Documentation points
Document:
Common unsafe management plans
Avoid:
Follow-up and coordination with other professionals
Coordinate with:
Follow-up should review:
Learner checkpoint
Have I gathered enough information across settings before deciding whether ADHD assessment is appropriate?
Relevant guidance areas
This includes guidance and resources on:
NICE guidance
RCGP and SCA resources
Key principles to remember
Transferable learning for future cases
In child behaviour consultations:
Supervisor or examiner lens
A supervisor or examiner is likely to look for:
Final learner takeaway
Possible ADHD in a 5-year-old requires synthesis across settings: behaviour only at home is a cue to explore sleep, routines and family context before diagnosing.