Arrythmia

start timer

ℹ️ This is the case information for the doctor.

Name

John Johnson

Age

82 years

Address

1 Duckworth Grove

Social history

Retired mechanical engineer

Past history

  • 13 months ago,  Chest Infection
  • 10 years ago,  Hypertension

Investigation results

  • ECG taken 10 days ago - see below

Medication

  • Amlodipine 5mg once daily
  • Ramipril 2.5mg once daily

Booking note

Follow up appointment for results.

ℹ️ This is the information for the person role playing the patient.

Case overview

Name

John Johnson

Age

82 years

Address

1 Duckworth Grove

Social history

Retired mechanical engineer

Past history

  • 13 months ago,  Chest Infection
  • 10 years ago,  Hypertension

Medication

  • Amlodipine 5mg once daily
  • Ramipril 2.5mg once daily

Opening statement

"I've come back for the results of the heart test I had done a while ago, doctor. I've been feeling more tired than usual lately."

Information freely divulged

  • "I've been feeling more tired over the last few months."
  • "The nurse at my last blood pressure check mentioned I had an irregular pulse."
  • "I had an ECG done ten days ago and I'm here to get the results."

Information given on questioning

  • Impact: "I'm not very active, but I do love gardening. Lately, I've been too tired to get much done in the garden."
  • Concerns: "I haven't been particularly concerned about the ECG test results."
  • Health understanding: "Some of my friends are on warfarin, and I've heard a bit about it."
  • Preferences: "I'm open to trying an anticoagulant, but I might struggle to get to the surgery frequently for blood tests."

Questions on learning of your diagnosis:

  • "I'd like to know how atrial fibrillation develops."
  • "I'm interested in learning how atrial fibrillation is treated."
  • "Will treating this condition help improve my energy levels?"
  • "Is there any assistance available for transport to attend frequent blood tests?"

Behaviour

  • Act calmly and without alarm upon hearing about atrial fibrillation. Exhibit curiosity and an eagerness to understand more about atrial fibrillation. Demonstrate a willingness to potentially start anticoagulant treatment.
  • If the doctor explains the need for frequent blood tests and the challenges associated with it, express mild concern and inquire about transportation assistance. If the doctor empathises and provides comprehensive information, respond appreciatively and with understanding.

ℹ️ To mark data gathering & diagnosis select from the descriptors below.

Positive descriptors

Negative descriptors

Data gathering was systematic and targeted ensuring patient safety:

  • Uses open questions to allow John to express his recent experiences of fatigue.
  • Follows up with specific questions about symptoms (dizziness or palpitations) and AF risk factors.

Data gathering was incomplete, lacking structure and focus:

  • Fails to provide John with an opportunity to elaborate on his symptoms of fatigue or possible palpitations.
  • Shows limited curiosity in exploring the history further.

Makes effective use of existing information and considers the wider context:

  • Reviews John's past medical history of hypertension and previous chest infection.
  • Integrates this information with his ECG, current medication, and symptoms to build an understanding of risk, cause, and impact.

Fails to use the information provided or understand the wider context:

  • Ignores John's history of hypertension.
  • Does not consider key factors important to assessing stroke risk(HF, DM, vascular disease) and bleeding risk (bleeding history, renal impairment, anaemia).

The presence or absence of relevant red flags was established:

  • Enquires about any new or worsening symptoms such as severe breathlessness, chest pain, or syncopal episodes.
  • Screens for potential complications from atrial fibrillation or its treatment e.g. haemodynamic instability, hypotension, stroke, bleeding.

Fails to assess key information necessary to determine risk:

  • Omits questions about potentially serious symptoms associated with rate control, such as chest pain or significant dizziness.
  • Misses important risk factors for complications of AF or its treatment.

Information gathered placed the problem in its psychosocial context:

  • Enquires about how fatigue impacts John's enjoyment of gardening and his capacity to carry out daily activities.
  • Explores the psychological and social implications of reduced energy levels on his overall quality of life.

The social and psychological impact of the problem was not adequately determined:

  • Fails to link John's fatigue to its effects on his hobbies such as gardening.
  • Misses the broader psychosocial consequences of his health issue on his lifestyle and well-being.

A working diagnosis was reached using a structured, evidence-based approach:

  • Gathers story through open questions before progressing to targeted questions about John's symptoms leading to a diagnosis of AF.
  • Diagnoses atrial fibrillation after considering all available data.
  • Collects information on important management aspects such as rate control, haemodynamic stability and patient preference.

The evidence collected was inadequate to support the conclusions reached:

  • Does not recognise the ECG as indicating atrial fibrillation.
  • Fails to gather information to contextualise the condition in terms of likely causes and severity.

Uses an understanding of probability based on prevalence, incidence, and natural history to aid decision-making:

  • Assesses hypertension as the most likely cause of AF in elderly patients with hypertension absent of other risk factors.
  • Gathers data on less common causes to assess risk e.g. ischaemic heart disease, valvular heart disease, diabetes, sleep apnoea, thyroid disease, lung disease.

Choice of diagnosis and/or investigations does not reflect disease likelihood:

  • Suggests rare causes or inappropriate tests (e.g., autoantibody screening without indication).
  • Fails to use prevalence and demographic data to inform clinical reasoning.

ℹ️ To mark clinical management & medical complexity select from the descriptors below.

Positive descriptors

Negative descriptors

Offers management options that are safe and appropriate:

  • Discusses management of atrial fibrillation, including the likely success of rate and rhythm control options.
  • Considers anticoagulation with a DOAC, taking into account the patient’s preferences and practical limitations, such as difficulty accessing frequent blood tests.

Fails to provide appropriate and/or safe management choices:

  • Avoids discussing anticoagulation with the patient.
  • Neglects to explain the risks and benefits of treatment.
  • Fails to consider the patient's circumstances and possible concerns related to the logistics of blood tests.

Continuity of care is prioritised:

  • Suggests a structured follow-up plan for monitoring atrial fibrillation and its treatment.
  • Encourages engagement with regular reviews to assess treatment efficacy and adapt management as needed over time.

Ongoing care is uncoordinated:

  • Does not propose any follow-up plan for assessing response to treatment.
  • Fails to address ongoing symptoms, resulting in unclear long-term management for the patient.

Empowers self-care and independence:

  • Educates the patient on recognising symptoms of atrial fibrillation.
  • Advises on active lifestyle adjustments to improve energy levels.
  • Encourages self-management in the context of their cardiovascular health.

Management fails to foster self-care and patient involvement:

  • Provides little information to the patient about self-monitoring.
  • Offers insufficient guidance on lifestyle changes that could help manage their tiredness or overall health.

Prescribes safely considering local and national guidance:

  • Applies NICE guidelines for managing atrial fibrillation, including recommendations for anticoagulation.
  • Offers a DOAC and discusses potential side effects.
  • Explains the need for annual monitoring requirements.

Unsafe prescribing ignoring best practice:

  • Ignores or inadequately discusses anticoagulation or treatment guidelines.
  • Fails to conduct appropriate risk assessment before starting treatment.
  • Omits essential investigations, such as FBC, renal function tests, and estimated creatinine clearance calculation, potentially exposing the patient to risk.

Assesses risk:

  • Demonstrates understanding of the risk balance between stroke and bleeding.
  • Explains that, in this scenario, the risk of stroke clearly outweighs the risk of bleeding, and collects data needed for a formal calculation using CHA2DS2 VASC and ORBIT.

Poor understanding of risk:

  • Fails to consider arranging formal calculation of risk when assessing the patient.
  • Lacks awareness that the risk–benefit ratio strongly favours anticoagulation.

Manages multiple health problems concurrently:

  • Integrates atrial fibrillation treatment with overall cardiovascular risk management.
  • Considers lipid control, hypertension management, and lifestyle measures as part of a comprehensive approach.

Focuses on individual health problems without considering interactions between them:

  • Treats atrial fibrillation in isolation, disregarding its relationship with existing hypertension treatment.
  • Risks complicating management and outcomes by neglecting interactions between co-existing health issues.

ℹ️ To mark relating to others select from the descriptors below.

Positive descriptors

Negative descriptors

Communicates in a person-centred way:

  • Engages with John as an individual, acknowledging his concerns about energy levels and gardening.
  • Adapts explanations about atrial fibrillation to suit John's level of understanding.
  • Ensures John feels supported throughout the consultation.

Communication is doctor centred and lacks empathy:

  • Uses medical jargon without explanation, making information inaccessible to John.
  • Fails to address John's personal concerns about fatigue and his ability to garden.
  • Does not acknowledge John's emotions or involve him in treatment decisions.

Makes effective use of existing information and considers the wider context:

  • Reviews John's past medical history of hypertension and previous chest infection.
  • Integrates this information with his ECG, current medication, and symptoms to build an understanding of risk, cause, and impact.

Consults rigidly, providing generic explanations and management plans:

  • Delivers standard explanations about atrial fibrillation without checking John's understanding.
  • Fails to adjust information to address John’s specific concerns about fatigue and transportation needs for blood tests.

Checks the patient’s understanding of the consultation including any agreed plans:

  • Confirms John understands the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation and the proposed treatment plan.
  • Arranges appropriate follow-up to support ongoing care.
  • Encourages questions to ensure clarity and address any uncertainties.

Does not seek to confirm understanding:

  • Concludes the consultation without verifying John’s understanding of his condition and treatment options.
  • Fails to clarify the necessary steps John should take for managing his atrial fibrillation.
  • Leaves John uncertain about how to manage his condition effectively.

Demonstrates an empathic approach, and a willingness to help and care for the patient:

  • Responds sensitively to John’s fatigue and mild anxiety about blood test appointments.
  • Offers reassurance and emotional support to address his concerns.
  • Explores potential avenues for transport or assistance to facilitate appointments.

Lacks empathy and fails to recognise emotional cues:

  • Minimises or ignores John’s practical concerns and feelings about tiredness.
  • Does not offer reassurance or emotional support during the consultation.
  • Creates a cold and transactional atmosphere by neglecting John’s emotional needs.

Treats patients fairly and with respect:

  • Listens respectfully to John’s views regarding his ability to attend frequent blood tests.
  • Acknowledges John’s mobility and transport challenges.
  • Discusses anticoagulation options in a supportive, non-judgemental manner.

Decisions fail to prioritise the patient’s rights and interests:

  • Dismisses or overlooks John’s stated difficulties with attending frequent appointments.
  • Fails to explore alternatives or adaptations to accommodate his needs.
  • Does not respect John’s autonomy or consider his social situation in the decision-making process.

Takes ownership of decisions utilising the wider team:

  • Clearly explains the rationale behind the management plan.
  • Seeks multidisciplinary support (e.g., pharmacist for adherence and monitoring, phlebotomy appointments, transport services).
  • Provides information leaflets and refers to exercise services and support groups to help maintain John’s cardiovascular health.

Does not take ownership or utilise the wider team effectively:

  • Makes a plan without considering barriers to care John might face.
  • Fails to involve other services or discuss alternatives when problems arise with standard care pathways.

ℹ️ Insights from the examiner

1. Time Efficient Data Gathering

Open questions at the start help John share his story and priorities. Good examples:

“I can see you have had some tests done, was that what you came about today?”

This is a good start because it tells John you have read his notes, whilst avoiding making assumptions as to John’s agenda for today’s consultation. Making assumptions about the consultation agenda can result in doctors managing the wrong problem i.e. the problem that is not the patient’s priority.

“We haven’t met before and I can see you have had some tests recently, can you tell me more about why you had them?”

You haven’t met John before and so this fact can be used as a lever to get John to tell you his story. A rich story will help you to efficiently collect key information about his symptoms, ideas, concerns and expectations.

2. Language

Use simple, jargon-free language tailored to John’s lay understanding. An example might be:

“The heart test you had—your ECG—shows your heart is beating in an irregular way called atrial fibrillation.”
“This condition is common, especially as people get older, and it means your heart sometimes beats unevenly.”

That simple explanation may be all that John wants to know in terms of technical details. Pause to let John tell you what he wants to know. Deliver info in short chunks checking you are answering his questions and personalising your response to his situation. E.g.

“It can reduce your energy levels and perhaps that is why you have not been able to enjoy your garden as much. The good news is there is treatment that can help and hopefully that will help restore your energy levels”

The above is a ‘sunny – gloomy’ pair. A bit of bad news, followed by some good news. Positively framing bad news in this way can help patients to cope psychologically.

Reference: Roberts,C., Atkins, S., & Hawthorne, K. (2014). Performance features in clinical skills assessment: Linguistic and cultural factors in the Membership of the Royal College of General Practitioners examination. King's College London with The University of Nottingham

3. Cues’

Notice and respond to cues about concerns and understanding:

  • John is not overly anxious but curious, you can encourage John to engage by acknowledging this:
“It’s great you’re curious—many people don’t know much about AF.”
  • Higher scoring candidates recognise that John’s concerns relate to the monitoring of warfarin:
“A lot of people have heard of warfarin, but there are now newer medications that might suit you better and don’t need frequent blood testing.”
  • Validating his concerns will help him feel listened to, build rapport and reduce anxiety.  “I appreciate that getting out for appointments can be a challenge for some people.”


Reference: RCGPSCA Toolkit

4. Goals

Check for patient goals using the information you have collected:

“I can see you want to get back to gardening, or is there something else you hope for?”

Agree on shared objectives:

“Let’s aim to reduce your stroke risk and help you feel more energetic for activities you enjoy.”

 

Reference: Shared decision making – NICE NG197

5. Flow

Here are some examples of letting the conversation flow naturally, building on John’s responses:

  • After he mentions tiredness and gardening: “Apart from gardening, does this tiredness affect any other part of your life?”
  • Link back to patient information: “You mentioned being more tired; sometimes AF can contribute to this. Can you tell me how your sleep and mood have been?”

Acknowledge and build on each answer, helping the patient to follow your train of thought.

Reference: Roger Neighbour's The Inner Consultation

Reference: Roberts,C., Atkins, S., & Hawthorne, K. (2014). Performance features in clinical skills assessment: Linguistic and cultural factors in the Membership of the Royal College of General Practitioners examination. King's College London with The University of Nottingham

 

6. Impact

Explore how AF is affecting daily life and wellbeing:

“You mentioned you love gardening—how much are you able to do compared to before?”
“Has your tiredness stopped you from seeing friends, shopping, or doing other hobbies?”
“How is your mood?”

This helps to gauge urgency and tailor management.

Reference: Patient-centred care: NICE

7. Conciseness

Clear, concise explanations help understanding:

“Your ECG shows atrial fibrillation, which is when your heart beats irregularly. This can make you feel tired and, if untreated, increases the risk of stroke
“To reduce that risk, we use medicines to thin the blood. The older type, warfarin, needs lots of blood tests, but newer ones don’t.”
“We’ll keep an eye on side effects and how you’re feeling, but you won’t need to come in as often.”

Reference: Patient info leaflet

9. Sharing

Share thought processes to aid understanding and involvement:

“Given your age and the results, you have a higher than average chance of a stroke with AF, so anticoagulation is usually recommended.”
“We usually use a checklist—called a risk score—to make sure this is safe for you, perhaps we can go through this together.”
“The tiredness is likely to improve once the AF is managed, especially if it’s the main cause.”
   

10. Options

Offer a balanced menu of management choices, including practical options:

  1. Start  a DOAC (e.g., apixaban, rivaroxaban) – preferred due to minimal   monitoring (BNF: DOACs in AF)
  2. Start  warfarin – traditional but requires frequent blood (INR) tests; less attractive unless contraindications to DOACs.
  3. Rate  control medication – to steady heart rate, which may improve symptoms (NICE guidance)
  4. Rhythm  control (in some cases) – drugs or procedures to restore normal rhythm, discussed if symptoms persist.
  5. Lifestyle  advice –exercise as tolerated, no smoking, moderate alcohol, good  hydration (British Heart Foundation)
  6. Monitor  blood pressure – regular checks, adjust medication as needed.
  7. Education  materials on AF – signpost to NHS, Heart Foundation or Patient.info leaflets.
  8. Social  prescribing/transport help – connect with community transport  schemes if blood monitoring is needed.
  9. Regular  follow-up and continuity – arrange to see the same doctor or  nurse practitioner.
  10. Bleeding  risk assessment – discuss need for bleeding checks, falls  prevention (as part of anticoagulation discussion).

As John expects frequent blood tests for anticoagulation ,explain

“That’s the case with warfarin, but with newer anticoagulants like apixaban or rivaroxaban, you won’t need to come in very often at all.”
“We’ll  just check bloods every year, unless there’s a problem, which people usually find much easier.”

Reference: NICE AF management

11. Understanding

Check for understanding and encourage active participation. For example:

“Can I check—does it make sense why we’re recommending this treatment, and how it might help you?
“What questions do you have about these options?
“How do you feel about the idea of taking a medication to thin the blood and help protect against stroke?”

Reference: NICE: Shared decision making

12. Bespoke Solutions

Offer a tailored solution combining clinical evidence and John’s concerns:

“Considering your concerns about travel for blood tests, a newer anticoagulant would  avoid the need for frequent visits. Is that something you’d find helpful?”
“As you’re keen to get back to gardening, and we’ve agreed we should try to reduce your chances of a stroke starting on a blood thinner and another medicine  to keep your heart rate from racing might be the best option from those we’ve discussed. We would need to monitor how you feel and keep an eye out for any side effects. What more would you like to know about that?
“Would you like a leaflet about AF, and I’ll arrange for you to see me again in the next few weeks to check in—does that sound like a good plan to you?”
“If you’d like, I can also arrange a phone call from our social prescriber about local support groups.”

Use your understanding of John’s values and lifestyle to build the plan; explicitly incorporate his willingness to try anticoagulation but acknowledge and address his concern about practicalities.

Other helpful references