CKD

start timer

ℹ️ This is the case information for the doctor.

Name

Dorothy Parker

Age

68 years

Address

7 Balliol Avenue

Social history

  • Living circumstances: Lives alone in a bungalow. Husband died 2 years ago.
  • Support: A neighbour helps with shopping.
  • Smoking/Alcohol: Not documented.
  • Employment: Retired school secretary

Past history

  • Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3 (first diagnosed 15 months ago)
  • Hypertension (diagnosed 10 years ago)

Investigation results

  • 10 days ago: Urea 4 mmol/L (2.5-7.5), Creatinine 76 umol/L (45-84), eGFR 52 ml/min/1.73m2
  • 4 months ago: BP 140/84 mmHg
  • 15 months ago: Urea 4.2 mmol/L, Creatinine 74 umol/L, eGFR 54 ml/min/1.73m2

Medication

  • Amlodipine 10mg once daily
  • Ramipril 5mg once daily
  • Allergies: None

Booking note

Appointment to discuss surgery letter.

ℹ️ This is the information for the person role playing the patient.

Case overview

Name

Dorothy Parker

Age

68 years

Address

7 Balliol Avenue

Social history

  • Living circumstances: Lives alone in a bungalow. Husband died 2 years ago.
  • Support: A neighbour helps with shopping.
  • Smoking/Alcohol: Not documented.
  • Employment: Retired school secretary

Past history

  • Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3 (first diagnosed 15 months ago)
  • Hypertension (diagnosed 10 years ago)

Medication

  • Amlodipine 10mg once daily
  • Ramipril 5mg once daily
  • Allergies: None

Opening statement

I've come about this letter I got from the surgery. It says I need to do a urine test because I have something wrong with my kidneys. I wonder if it has gone to the wrong person as I don't have a kidney problem as far as I'm aware.

Information freely divulged

  • You have come about this letter which has been worrying you as you are unaware of having any kidney troubles.
  • You only have high blood pressure (hypertension) as a medical problem.
  • You always remember to take your medicine every day.
  • You don’t have any allergies and aren’t taking any other medication.
  • You live alone since your husband died two years ago, and a neighbour helps with shopping.
  • You feel well; you have no symptoms like pain, tiredness, swelling, or problems passing urine.
  • You have no history of kidney problems in the family.

Information given on questioning

  • The remainder of your kidney history and symptoms:
    • If asked, you have never been told you had kidney problems before, and this letter has completely surprised you.
    • No issues with your urine or passing water.
    • No recent infections, weight loss, or other symptoms.
  • Ideas:
    • You thought you were healthy except for high blood pressure, so you do not understand what might be wrong with your kidneys.
  • Concerns:
    • Your main fear (only divulged if directly asked about worries or concerns) is that you’ll need dialysis—your best friend needed it and you saw how hard it was on her.
    • Otherwise, you are worried because you thought you were well, and don’t know what is happening inside.
  • Expectations:
    • You want to know what is wrong, if you are at risk of needing dialysis, why the test is needed, and what you can do to stop any damage or further problems.
    • You are hoping the doctor can explain everything in a way you can understand and reassure you, if appropriate.
  • Family History:
    • No relatives with kidney disease, and as far as you know, no unusual illnesses in the family.

Behaviour

  • You are visibly shocked and anxious about the letter and the mention of kidney disease, even though you feel well physically.
  • If the doctor listens attentively, explains things confidently, and answers your questions in simple, clear terms, you will be relieved and grateful—your anxiety will decrease.
  • If the doctor appears unsure, vague, or dismisses your concerns, you become more worried and less trusting, possibly insistent about understanding what is happening.
  • If the doctor suggests anything about dialysis, you will become noticeably distressed and recall your friend’s difficult experience, but will open up about this if the doctor is empathetic.
  • Throughout, you need reassurance and clear communication. If you don’t understand something, you will ask them to explain again.
  • You want to know what you can do to prevent things worsening and will be proactive in asking about diet, medications, and check-ups if it is explained clearly.
  • You are cross about the way the surgery has communicated your diagnosis of chronic kidney disease but will accept an apology if sincerely given.

ℹ️ To mark data gathering & diagnosis select from the descriptors below.

Positive descriptors

Negative descriptors

Data gathering was systematic and targeted ensuring patient safety.

  • Uses open questions at the start to explore Dorothy’s understanding of the letter, her feelings, and her beliefs about her health.
  • Progresses to clear, targeted closed questions covering relevant symptoms, medical history, medications, and risk factors.

Data gathering was incomplete, lacking structure and focus.

  • Fails to clarify what prompted Dorothy’s attendance, neglecting her presenting concerns.
  • Jumps between topics without a clear structure and omits key areas.

Makes effective use of existing information and considers the wider context:

  • Integrates key clinical data from Dorothy’s notes (eGFR trend, recent bloods, CKD diagnosis).
  • Explores her living circumstances, support network, and recent bereavement to build a holistic understanding of her situation.

Fails to use the information provided or understand the wider context:

  • Ignores or misinterprets previous lab results and does not recognise the stable trend in kidney function.
  • Overlooks the significance of Dorothy’s living situation and support needs, missing potential impacts on her ongoing care.

The presence or absence of relevant red flags was established:

  • Checks for red flag symptoms such as visible haematuria, loin pain, recurrent UTIs, fever, or unintentional weight loss.
  • Identifies symptoms indicative of renal disease, including urinary frequency, lethargy and ankle swelling.

Fails to assess key information necessary to determine risk:

  • Omits enquiry about symptoms that could indicate rapidly progressive or secondary kidney disease.
  • Misses gathering crucial information needed for accurate risk assessment.

Information gathered placed the problem in its psychosocial context:

  • Explores Dorothy’s emotional response to the letter and diagnosis.
  • Assesses her support network following her husband’s death.
  • Examines the effect of her health concerns on her daily life.

The social and psychological impact of the problem was not adequately determined:

  • Omits questions about Dorothy’s social or emotional wellbeing.
  • Ignores psychological distress related to the unexpected diagnosis.
  • Overlooks Dorothy’s anxiety triggered by her friend’s experiences.

Relevant information was collected to place the undifferentiated problem in context and an appropriate differential diagnosis generated:

  • Systematically explores contributors to reduced renal function (e.g., medication side effects, infections, obstructive symptoms).
  • Avoids assuming hypertension is the only cause by considering a broad differential diagnosis.

Inadequate information was collected to determine the likely cause of symptoms:

  • Omits exploration of alternative or additional causes of CKD, such as medication nephrotoxicity or undiagnosed diabetes.
  • Does not screen for other potential risk factors.

Uses an understanding of probability based on prevalence, incidence, and natural history to aid decision-making:

  • Assesses hypertension as the most likely cause of CKD in asymptomatic elderly patients with hypertension and stable blood test results.
  • Assigns lower probability to uncommon conditions (e.g., autoimmune disease) based on Dorothy’s demographic and symptom profile.

Choice of diagnosis and/or investigations does not reflect disease likelihood:

  • Suggests rare causes or inappropriate tests (e.g., autoantibody screening without indication).
  • Fails to use prevalence and demographic data to inform clinical reasoning.

ℹ️ To mark clinical management & medical complexity select from the descriptors below.

Positive descriptors

Negative descriptors

Manages uncertainty, including that experienced by the patient:

  • Explains CKD stages and prognosis clearly and empathetically.
  • Provides safety netting by advising on symptoms of deterioration and when to seek help.

Struggles with uncertainty, leading to inconsistent decisions:

  • Omits adequate information about natural history, prognosis, or relevant risks.
  • Creates confusion by offering conflicting or incomplete advice regarding future kidney function.

Tailors management options responsively according to circumstances, priorities and preferences:

  • Involves Dorothy in care planning and encourages her to set preferences for future reviews.
  • Prioritises what matters most to Dorothy, such as keeping tablet burden low and maintaining independence.

Management options fail to adequately consider patient preference and circumstance:

  • Delivers rigid, one-size-fits-all management without exploring Dorothy’s wishes or priorities.
  • Fails to explain management options in a way that Dorothy understands, resulting in her feeling confused or unsatisfied with her involvement in decisions.

Practises holistically, promoting health, and safeguarding:

  • Explores how the diagnosis affects Dorothy emotionally and addresses her fears around dialysis and isolation.
  • Connects Dorothy to sources of support (exercise groups, CKD leaflets, LTC nurse).
  • Encourages general health measures such as vaccinations and cardiovascular risk reduction.

Fails to safeguard patient welfare:

  • Focuses solely on kidney function, overlooking Dorothy’s emotional and practical needs.
  • Ignores her anxiety and fails to consider issues related to her living alone.

Prescribes safely considering local and national guidance:

  • Reviews current prescribing to ensure they are optimal for both hypertension management and kidney protection in line with NICE guidance.
  • Reminds Dorothy to avoid over-the-counter NSAIDs.
  • Considers and implements any necessary dose adjustments.

Unsafe prescribing ignoring best practice:

  • Increases or stops antihypertensives inappropriately, disregarding best practice guidelines.
  • Ignores eGFR trends when making prescribing decisions.
  • Fails to check for drug interactions that are relevant to CKD.

Empowers self-care and independence:

  • Encourages Dorothy’s active involvement by explaining steps she can take, such as keeping blood pressure well controlled, staying active, maintaining a healthy weight, avoiding NSAIDs, and keeping hydrated.
  • Explains the importance of medication adherence.

Management fails to foster self-care and patient involvement:

  • Fails to offer advice on lifestyle modification.
  • Makes plans for Dorothy without her involvement, leaving her reliant solely on medical intervention.

Arranges appropriate follow-up:

  • Clearly sets out a schedule for check-ups, including annual bloods and urine tests, biannual blood pressure monitoring, and regular medication review.
  • Provides clear safety-netting advice, such as instructing Dorothy to contact her GP if she notices swelling, changes in urine, or feels unwell.

Unclear or inadequate follow-up:

  • Leaves Dorothy without a clear plan for ongoing care, resulting in uncertainty about next steps.
  • Suggests a “wait and see” approach without providing structure or recommended monitoring intervals, increasing the risk of missed deterioration.

ℹ️ To mark relating to others select from the descriptors below.

Positive descriptors

Negative descriptors

Shows ability to communicate in a person-centred way:

  • Acknowledges Dorothy’s shock on receiving the letter.
  • Explores and validates her emotional response to the news.
  • Apologises for any distress caused.

Communication is doctor-centred and lacks empathy:

  • Provides only factual information about CKD or test results.
  • Fails to acknowledge Dorothy’s anxiety or emotional experience.
  • Misses opportunities to put Dorothy at ease or address her concerns.

Makes effective use of existing information and considers the wider context:

  • Integrates key clinical data from Dorothy’s notes (eGFR trend, recent bloods, CKD diagnosis).
  • Explores her living circumstances, support network, and recent bereavement to build a holistic understanding of her situation.

Fails to recognise the patient's agenda and impact of the problem:

  • Does not reocgnise Dorothy’s understanding of the situation.
  • Offers generic explanations without adapting them to Dorothy’s specific needs or circumstances.

Recognises what matters to the patient and works collaboratively to enhance patient care:

  • Invites Dorothy to participate in decisions by discussing her priorities, such as maintaining wellbeing and independence.
  • Co-produces a care plan that aligns with her wishes and understanding.

Fails to work with the patient to plan care:

  • Imposes a management plan or makes suggestions about testing without exploring what Dorothy wants.
  • Ignores consideration of which outcomes are most important to her.

Demonstrates flexibility of communication adapting to the patient and scenario:

  • Explains technical concepts like “CKD stage 3” in plain language.
  • Uses analogies or visual aids to aid understanding, if needed.

Consults rigidly, providing generic explanations and management plans:

  • Delivers information using medical jargon and standard explanations.
  • Fails to adjust communication style when Dorothy appears worried or seeks clarification.

Respectfully challenges unhelpful health beliefs or behaviours:

  • Addresses Dorothy’s fear of inevitably needing dialysis with sensitivity and understanding.
  • Corrects misconceptions about chronic kidney disease with empathy, explaining that CKD can be stable and managed.

Fails to maintain a productive therapeutic relationship:

  • Responds dismissively to Dorothy’s fear of dialysis, minimising her concerns.
  • Provides blunt correction that creates tension and undermines trust between practitioner and patient.

Works collaboratively in a team showing respect for colleagues:

  • Explains the roles of other health professionals (e.g. practice nurse for BP checks, vaccinations, lifestyle advice).
  • Encourages Dorothy to engage with the surgery’s wider support network and reinforces shared goals.

Fails to work effectively with team members to deliver optimal care:

  • Omits mention of the wider healthcare team involved in Dorothy’s care.
  • Undermines collaborative working, resulting in fragmented or confusing care planning.

ℹ️ Insights from the examiner

Case Summary: Dorothy is a 68-year-old woman who is unaware of her chronic kidney disease (CKD stage 3), which is stable and most likely due to long-standing hypertension and age. She is shocked and worried after getting a letter about her kidneys and fears dialysis. She is otherwise well with no symptoms or relevant family history. The aim is to confirm the diagnosis, assess causes and modifiable risk factors, and reassure the patient.

Time efficient data gathering

Open questions are essential at the start to allow Dorothy to share her understanding and concerns about the letter. It is important to listen and without interruption, acknowledging the concerns as they are raised so that Dorothy feels reassured her concerns have been heard. It is important for the doctor to check the letter content information corresponds with the kidney results on file. Efficient data gathering involves clarifying what she knows, how she feels, and then checking for any red flag or overlooked symptoms of kidney disease or secondary causes. For example:

"I can understand why you would be worried about an unexpected letter, and I'm sorry it upset you. Can you tell me a bit more about the letter and how you have been feeling and then perhaps I can help explain why it was sent?'

Examples of targeted questions:

"Have you noticed any changes such as swelling, tiredness, or problems passing urine?"
"Do you have any family history of kidney problems, diabetes, or autoimmune conditions?"

Explore medication causes of renal impairment, and explore lifestyle briefly:

"Can you tell me about the medicines you take and if you’re taking anything else, including over-the-counter?"

Link: NICE CKD CKS

Language

Connect by using clear, simple language. Avoid jargon. Recognise that “CKD” and “kidney disease” can sound frightening. For example:

"Your kidneys are working less well than when you were younger, but they are still working well. If they keep working at this level they won't cause you a problem. The reason for the slight worsening is most commonly age and high blood pressure."

Use analogies if helpful:

"Think of your kidneys as filters that, over time, may not work quite as efficiently, a bit like how our eyesight or hearing change with age."

Reference: MRCGP annual reports and research

Cues

Recognise Dorothy's verbal and non-verbal cues: she is shocked and anxious about the letter and mentions a friend who needed dialysis. Respond with empathy, for example:

"I can see this was a real shock for you, and I understand why you might be worried after seeing what your friend went through."

When she asks, "Will I need dialysis?", pause and address this specifically.

Goals

Set explicit consultation goals together. Early on in management, involve her:

"By the end of our conversation, would it be helpful if I could explain what your kidneys are doing now, what this means for your health, and what we can do to keep you well?"

Flow

Keep Dorothy on board with a logical progression through your conversation. Start with Dorothy's story, check for symptoms, review medication and risk factors, then explain the results and diagnosis before moving to management. It helps to acknowledge her replies in transitions:

"Thank you for sharing that. Let’s look together at your recent test results and I’ll explain what they mean."

Differential

Generate an appropriate differential based on likelihood:

  • 1. CKD stage 3 secondary to hypertension and age (most likely in a 68-year-old with a history of hypertension and gradual decline in eGFR)
  • 2. CKD from other vascular causes (e.g. atherosclerosis)
  • 3. Unrecognised diabetic nephropathy (if undiagnosed diabetes)
  • 4. Glomerulonephritis or other primary renal disease (less likely given lack of urinary symptoms or family history)
  • 5. Drug-induced nephropathy (if she had been exposed to nephrotoxic drugs)
  • 6. Obstructive uropathy (much less likely in absence of urinary symptoms)

Reference: NICE NG203: CKD

Impact

Understand the impact on Dorothy’s psychological wellbeing (shock, anxiety about dialysis, past bereavement, living alone). Ask:

"How has receiving this letter affected you day-to-day?"

Ask about daily activities, support, and coping to tailor advice and follow-up. Don’t forget the social context: living alone and needing reassurance.

Conciseness

Explanations should be brief and clear, avoiding jargon. For example, instead of "Your eGFR has been persistently 52ml/min for over 3 months, indicating stage 3 CKD," you might say:

"Your blood tests show your kidneys are working a bit less well than they used to, but this has been steady for some time. This is called stage 3 CKD and is very common as people get older, especially with high blood pressure. Most people with stage 3 CKD do not progress to more serious kidney problems"

Sharing

Share your reasoning and explain next steps:

"The most likely reason your kidneys are not working as well is your blood pressure over the years. The good news is it’s stable and there are things we can do together to protect your kidneys."

Verbalise your process:

"We send urine tests to check for any extra signs of kidney stress or hidden damage, so we don’t miss anything."

Reference: Consulting in a nutshell, Roger Neighbour

Options

Provide a menu of evidence-based options, discussing pros and cons and addressing Dorothy's expects and concerns around dialysis.

  1. Continued monitoring of kidney function with annual blood and urine tests (uACR, eGFR, creatinine).
  2. Regular blood pressure monitoring and control (target ≤140/90 or as per comorbidities).
  3. Reviewing medication for nephrotoxicity (avoid NSAIDs, careful with ACE inhibitors but continue unless contraindications).
  4. Lifestyle optimisation: maintaining healthy weight, exercise as tolerated, low salt intake, adequate hydration, not over-restricting protein or fluids without dietitian advice.
  5. Vaccinations (annual flu, pneumococcal, COVID-19) to reduce infection risk.
  6. Information on recognising symptoms that would require prompt review (e.g., swelling, breathlessness, change in urine, confusion, persistent vomiting).
  7. Addressing psychosocial factors: offering access to support for emotional well-being, signposting to kidney charities if wanted.
  8. If persistent proteinuria, declining eGFR, or unclear cause, consider referral to nephrology—explain current need is low given stability.

Reference: NICE CKD Guideline

Understanding

Encourage engagement and check Dorothy’s understanding  using open prompts:

"I’ve given you a lot of information. What questions do you have?"

Expecting questions gives permission for patients to ask, and encourages patient engagement.

RCGP examiner feedback. N.Turner.

Bespoke solutions

Offer solutions matched to Dorothy’s health, ideas, and circumstances. Example:

" keeping active and making sure your blood pressure is controlled are some of the best ways to protect your kidneys. As you live alone, if you ever worried please contact us, particularly if you notice swelling, tiredness, or problems with your urine.
We will do some routine kidney tests every year to keep an eye on things together. If you’d like, I can connect you with a kidney charity for more support or information."

Adjust follow-up, management, and explanation depending on what matters to her (e.g., maintaining independence, fears about dialysis, support with healthy living).

Reference: MRCGP annual reports and research

Trusted Resources for Further Reading

Summary for Candidates: In this case, you are rewarded for a structured, patient-centred approach that starts with Dorothy’s agenda, provides simple and empathic explanations, targets reversible factors, advises evidence-based management, and checks understanding. It is important to acknowledge and address her psychological distress, correct misconceptions about dialysis, and provide reassurance about the problem and its common nature. Positively frame her situation and the many options she has to keep well.