ℹ️ This is the case information for the doctor.
Name
James Parker
Age
33 years
Address
15 Bluebell Crescent
Social history
• Occupation: Secondary school English teacher.
• Smoking status: Never smoked.
Past history
• No significant past medical history
Investigation results
None
Medication
None
Booking note
Fit note requested. Not feeling well. No prior sickness related absences on record.
ℹ️ This is the information for the person role playing the patient.
Name
James Parker
Age
33 years
Address
15 Bluebell Crescent
Social history
• Occupation: Secondary school English teacher.
• Smoking status: Never smoked.
Past history
• No significant past medical history
Medication
None
" I'd like to get a fit note for work. I've beeen reallly struggling in the last few weeeks and I'm not in a good place at the moment"
Open Story
• “I split up from my partner recently after five years together. Things had been really difficult for a while.”
• “It’s been a tough few weeks…I’m not sleeping well, can’t really eat, and I just feel really low most of the time.”
• “Work has been stressful anyway, but this has made it worse.”
• “I think I just need a couple of weeks out to try and get my head straight.”
• “I haven’t really been doing much outside work lately – I used to swim and run, but I haven’t felt up to it.”
Symptom details:
• Low mood most of the day.
• Tearful at times, including during the consultation.
• Poor sleep: “It takes me ages to fall asleep, and I keep waking up thinking about everything.”
• Appetite reduced: “I don’t really feel like eating.”
• Not enjoying things he used to: “Everything just feels flat.”
• No thoughts of self-harm or suicide: “Sometimes I wonder what the point of things is, but I wouldn’t harm myself.”
Ideas:
“I think it’s mostly the breakup that’s triggered all this. It’s been building up for months, but things are really overwhelming now.”
Concerns:
“I’m worried I won’t be able to cope at work and things will fall apart…I’m concerned about finding somewhere new to live as well, and just being on my own. I don’t really have anyone to talk to.”
Expectations:
“I’d like a fit note for a couple of weeks so I can try to get myself together.”
“I'd consider counselling but I’m not sure about taking tablets…but maybe you could explain more about them?”
“I’d prefer to stick to one doctor if possible. I really don’t want to have to explain everything again.”
Family history:
No family history of mental health problems. Parents alive and well, live in the North of England. Contact is every few weeks by phone.
Psychosocial background information:
• Occupation: Secondary school English teacher.
• Living situation: Until recently, lived with his partner of five years. Now temporarily staying at a friend’s flat while looking for somewhere more permanent.
• Relationship status: Just separated from long-term partner (relationship ended a few weeks ago).
• Social support: Social group mostly shared with ex-partner. Feels unable to discuss the breakup with them. Currently feeling isolated, with no close family nearby.
• Smoking status: Never smoked.
• Alcohol intake: Normally 1–2 units per week (glass of wine with dinner). Recently increased to 3-4 units per night (“it helps me take the edge off in the evenings”). No other substances.
• Physical activity: Used to swim and run regularly but has not taken part in any sport or exercise for many months or years.
• Hobbies/Interests: Previously enjoyed reading, music, watching films, and outdoor activities, but little interest in these at present.
• Finances: Some worries about money due to the potential need to rent or seek new accommodation.
Affect/mood: Appears withdrawn, tired, flat affect; becomes tearful when discussing the breakup. Describes symptoms quietly and hesitantly.
Behaviour: Initially tense, becomes more open and trusting if the doctor is empathetic and listens. If the doctor is brusque or makes assumptions (e.g., suggests going straight back to work or dismisses the impact of the breakup), becomes visibly upset and more withdrawn.
Requests: Calm but quietly insistent about needing time off; will clarify if the doctor suggests less than 2 weeks off that this would not be helpful (“I’m worried that wouldn’t be enough for me to feel better”).
Attitude to management: Reassured if the doctor validates his feelings and offers support. Willing to discuss options including counselling or self-help. Open but uncertain about antidepressants; would like them explained carefully if suggested.
If continuity is offered: Relieved and appreciative if the doctor acknowledges importance of follow-up with the same person.
If asked about suicidal thoughts: Denies, but admits life does not feel enjoyable. Will give clear negative answers if asked sensitively.
ℹ️ To mark data gathering & diagnosis select from the descriptors below.
Positive descriptors
Negative descriptors
Datagathering was systematic and targeted ensuring patient safety.
• Uses open questions to explore James’s reasons for requesting the fit note, recent life events, emotional wellbeing, and how symptoms are affecting daily function.
• Follows up with clear, focused questions to clarify symptom severity, triggers, social circumstances, and his expectations for time off and support.
Data gathering was incomplete, lacking structure and focus.
• Jumps straight to fit note logistics without exploring context or the emotional impact of the breakup.
• Omits key questions on mood symptoms, leaves important psychosocial information unaddressed, or uses unfocused/untargeted closed questions.
Makes effective use of existing information and considers the wider context.
• Integrates the background that James hasn’t been seen for over a year and recognises his isolation since the breakup.
• Considers wider issues such as housing, lack of support network, increased alcohol intake, and workplace pressures that could affect his mental health.
Fails to use the information provided or understand the wider context.
• Ignores or overlooks the significance of James’s prolonged absence from medical care and his current social situation.
• Misses the relevance of factors such as relationship breakdown, housing worries, or work environment to his current mental health difficulties.
The presence or absence of relevant red flags was established
• Asks directly about thoughts of self-harm or suicide, risk to self or others, significant weight loss, and loss of function at work.
• Clarifies absence of psychotic symptoms or significant risk factors, providing reassurance about immediate safety.
Fails to assess key information necessary to determine risk.
• Fails to check for risk of suicide or self-harm, or does not ask about other red flag symptoms such as psychosis or inability to cope.
• Does not confirm safety or enquire about changes in behaviour that increase clinical risk.
A working diagnosis was reached using a structured, evidence based approach.
• Gathers information on mood, sleep, appetite, energy, concentration, interests, and functional impact to support a diagnosis of moderate depression or adjustment disorder.
• Uses logical, structured questioning to rule out other causes and clarify the probable diagnosis.
The evidence collected was inadequate to support the conclusions reached.
• Reaches conclusions without systematically gathering symptoms or understanding functional impairment.
• Draws unsupported conclusions or bases diagnosis on assumption rather than evidence collected.
Uses an understanding of probability based on prevalence, incidence, and natural history to aid decision-making.
• Recognises that in a 33-year-old with recent stressful life events, depression or adjustment disorder are the most likely causes.
• Takes account of the increased risk of depressive episodes following relationship breakdown and the lifestyle/context clues (isolation, overwork).
Decision making does not demonstrate an understanding of probability based on prevalence, incidence, and natural history.
• Suggests or focuses on unlikely causes despite the classic context and presentation.
• Does not use the typical age, context, or symptom pattern to inform assessment.
The social and psychological impact of the problem was appropriately explored.
• Asks about how his mood, motivation, and poor concentration affect his teaching and daily life.
• Checks how James feels about support at work, his former hobbies, and his current sense of meaning or purpose.
The social and psychological impact of the problem was not adequately determined.
• Omits questions about how symptoms affect functioning at work, social isolation, or capacity to perform activities of daily living.
• Misses the relevance of his reduced enjoyment of previously important activities or the impact on his identity as a teacher and partner.
ℹ️ To mark clinical management & medical complexity select from the descriptors below.
Positive descriptors
Negative descriptors
Offers management options that are safe and appropriate
• Presents safe management choices, including a fit note for work absence, explanation of graded return options, and discussion on talking therapies (e.g. counselling, IAPT referral) as well as watchful waiting where appropriate.
• Explains pros and cons of antidepressants, addressing misconceptions and uncertainties, and ensures support regarding alcohol, sleep hygiene, and practical steps around housing.
Fails to provide appropriate and/or safe management choices
• Focuses solely on issuing the fit note without exploring underlying needs or additional supportive measures.
• Avoids discussing treatment options (e.g. talking therapy, medication) or fails to address increased alcohol intake, sleeping difficulties, or safety concerns.
Empowers self-care and independence
• Explains self-help resources (e.g., online CBT, NHS mood tools) and encourages healthy routines such as exercise, reduced alcohol use, and re-establishing social contact.
• Engages James in decisions about his mental health, supporting autonomy while encouraging gradual steps to recovery.
Management fails to foster self-care and patient involvement
• Does not involve James in decision-making or provide practical advice on self-care, lifestyle, or emotional well-being.
• Misses opportunities to encourage activity resumption or peer support.
Prescribes safely considering local and national guidance
• Considers current guidelines for depression management, discusses safe use of antidepressants only after explaining risks and benefits, and screens for problematic alcohol use.
• Advises on avoiding self-medicating with alcohol and ensures clear safety-netting for worsening symptoms.
Unsafe prescribing ignoring best practice
• Offers antidepressants without exploring other interventions or ensuring safe alcohol use.
• Ignores contraindications and fails to provide information about treatment duration, side effects, or monitoring requirements.
Refers appropriately being mindful of resource
• Makes appropriate referral to talking therapies (IAPT/counselling), discusses local support groups, and considers signposting to social prescribing or housing advice as relevant.
• Reserves urgent referrals for crisis only if indicated and does not overload secondary services unnecessarily.
Sends patients for specialist input unnecessarily
• Refers to secondary mental health care without clear indication or consideration of stepped care pathways.
• Misses opportunities to signpost local voluntary, housing, or online resources despite identified needs.
Arranges appropriate follow up and continuity of care
• Clearly arranges a timely follow-up, with instructions for earlier review if symptoms deteriorate, and reinforces support available between appointments. Invites James to follow up with the same GP, and acknowledges the value of continuity in building trust for ongoing support.
• Safety nets, advising when to seek urgent care (if suicidal ideation develops or functioning declines further).
Unclear or inadequate follow up
• Does not specify when or how James should next be reviewed, nor when and how to seek further help if things worsen.
• Leaves responsibility for re-contacting the GP entirely to James without reassurance or structure.
Tailors management options responsively according to circumstances, priorities, and preferences
• Actively involves James in choosing management steps, eliciting his views on medication, talking therapy, and the fit note.
• Adjusts advice to fit with James's current capacity, preferences for continuity, and support structures available.
Management options fail to adequately consider patient preference and circumstance
• Recommends rigid or standardised approaches, failing to take account of James's reluctance about certain treatments or his desire for GP continuity.
• Does not explore how individual circumstances (e.g., breakup, isolation) should influence the management plan.
ℹ️ To mark relating to others select from the descriptors below.
Positive descriptors
Negative descriptors
Shows ability to communicate in a person-centred way
• Acknowledges James’s emotional distress, exploring feelings of low mood, isolation, and grief following his recent breakup.
• Adapts language and explanations to ensure he feels heard and respected, validating the impact of loss and change in his life.
Communication is doctor-centred and lacks empathy
• Provides technical advice about depression or workplace policy without recognising James’s distress.
• Fails to acknowledge or explore the emotional weight of his recent experiences or his need to feel listened to.
Treats patients fairly and with respect
• Respects James’s autonomy and wishes regarding both treatment choices (hesitation about antidepressants) and the desire for follow-up with the same clinician.
• Shows non-judgemental understanding about increased alcohol use and his choice not to discuss issues with mutual friends.
Decisions fail to prioritise the patient’s rights and interests
• Imposes treatment options without regard for James’s concerns or preferences, or dismisses his desire for continuity.
• Criticises his coping strategies or blames him for isolation, failing to account for the complexity of his social situation.
Explores the patient’s agenda, health beliefs, and preferences
• Invites James to discuss his thoughts on the causes of his distress, preferred ways to get help, and expectations for the consultation and work absence.
• Explores his openness to talking therapies and reasons for uncertainty about medication.
Fails to recognise the patient’s agenda and impact of the problem
• Focuses on fit note logistics without uncovering James’s ideas, concerns, or expectations around recovery.
• Does not appreciate his wish for time off to “collect his thoughts,” or his hope for continuity with a single GP.
Recognises what matters to the patient and works collaboratively to enhance patient care
• Works with James to develop a shared plan—e.g., discussing how long off work might help, exploring practical next steps, and jointly considering follow-up or talking therapies.
• Explains management options in plain language, inviting questions and negotiating a plan reflecting his needs.
Fails to work with the patient to plan care
• Decides unilaterally about time off, fails to adapt advice to what James feels would help, or overlooks offers to discuss therapy or continuity of care.
• Misses cues about James’s priorities (emotional space, non-medication options, housing worries).
Demonstrates flexibility of communication adapting to the patient and scenario
• Adjusts consultation style to be gentle, supportive, and responsive when James becomes tearful.
• Uses simple explanations—avoiding jargon—making time for emotional support and clarifying complex choices.
Consults rigidly, providing generic explanations and management plans
• Delivers standardised advice on depression or work leave, ignoring James’s distress, cues, or hesitation.
• Fails to listen actively or react to changes in his affect or needs during the consultation.
Demonstrates an empathic approach, and a willingness to help and care for the patient
• Responds to signs of sadness and vulnerability with warmth, normalises distress following relationship loss, and offers practical follow-up and support.
• Creates a safe space so James feels comfortable sharing personal struggles without judgment.
Lacks empathy and fails to recognise emotional cues
• Ignores James’s emotional cues, such as becoming tearful or finding it hard to articulate distress.
• Provides information mechanically, with no offer of comfort, reassurance, or practical help for emotional needs.
ℹ️ Insights from the examiner
Case at a glance
James Parker is a 33-year-old teacher requesting a two-week fit note after a recent relationship breakup. He is feeling low and isolated, struggling at work, and is uncertain about what support or treatment options are available.
The consultation should not become purely administrative. A strong GP trainee should explore the severity, duration and impact of James’ symptoms, understand what he hopes a fit note will achieve, and agree a broader plan covering psychological, lifestyle, occupational and medical support.
GP trainee performance focus
A strong GP trainee needs to demonstrate:
What this case is testing
Patient priorities and concerns
James’ priorities may include:
Central challenge
The central challenge is to respond compassionately to James’ distress while avoiding an overly medicalised or purely administrative consultation focused only on the fit note.
The trainee needs to:
Red flags or high-risk features
Safety-net for deterioration in mood and risk. Important areas to assess and revisit include:
Common GP trainee pitfalls
What good looks like
A strong consultation is warm, structured and collaborative. The trainee validates James’ distress, explores function and safety, clarifies the purpose of the fit note, and agrees a realistic plan for support and review.
“It sounds like things have been very tough since the breakup, and work has become hard to manage. We can talk about the fit note, but I’d also like to understand how this is affecting you and what support might help.”
Learner checkpoint
Have I understood what James wants the fit note to achieve, as well as assessing his mood, function and safety?
Start with an open question
Begin by inviting James to tell his story rather than moving straight into a symptom checklist.
“Can you tell me what has been happening and how things have been for you since the breakup?”
This allows James to describe his experience in his own words and may reveal key information about mood, sleep, appetite, energy, work, relationships, coping and support.
Time-efficient data gathering
Empathic listening is not a delay; it can be efficient because it helps gather meaningful information while building rapport.
Explore:
Use clear, concise questions. Depression can affect thinking, so avoid asking several questions at once.
High-yield questions
Story and current symptoms
Mood, anxiety and function
Work impact
Home and relationships
Risk and safety
Use these sensitively and in the context of what James has already shared.
Functional, psychosocial or contextual assessment
Understanding impact is essential for assessing severity and planning support.
Explore James’ ability to manage:
Also consider work-related support:
Explore ideas, concerns and expectations
Clarify what James is hoping for from the consultation.
“Is your main goal to get some space to think, or are you hoping to talk through other support as well?”
Explore what he wants from:
This helps establish whether the immediate priority is a short period away from work, emotional support, practical help, treatment for depression or anxiety, or a combination.
Recognise and respond to cues
Important cues may include:
If James becomes tearful, pause and give space.
“I can see that just talking about this brings up a lot.”
Wait for him to be ready before moving on. Moving too quickly may appear lacking in empathy.
If he mentions feeling isolated:
“You mentioned feeling quite alone. Has it been hard not having anyone to confide in right now?”
Useful consultation phrases
“It sounds like things have been very tough, and you’re feeling really low since the breakup.”
“I don’t want this to be just about the fit note — I’d like to understand how you’re coping and what support would actually help.”
“Depression affects mood, sleep and energy. It’s common after difficult life changes.”
“We have several ways to help — some people feel better with therapy, some with medication, or a mix.”
“If I mention services like talking therapies, I’ll explain what they involve rather than using abbreviations.”
Consultation flow and signposting
Use signposting to make the consultation feel structured:
“We’ve talked about how this has affected your mood and work. I’d like to ask a bit about sleep, appetite and support, then we can decide together what would help next.”
Summarising and checking understanding
Before discussing the plan, summarise what James has told you.
“You’ve been feeling low and isolated since the breakup, your sleep and energy have been affected, and you’re finding work difficult. You’d like some time to recover but also want to understand what support could help.”
Check:
Data gathering self-check
Before moving to management, the trainee should know:
Assessment domain mapping
Data gathering
Clinical management
Relating to others
Prioritised differential diagnosis or clinical reasoning
James’ symptoms may represent low mood and anxiety following a significant life event.
The consultation should consider:
The fit note should form part of a broader assessment and management plan, not the whole consultation.
Clinical reasoning script
“What you’re describing can happen after a major life event, but it’s important we look at how much it’s affecting your sleep, energy, work and ability to cope. That helps us decide whether time away from work, talking therapy, lifestyle changes, medication, or a combination would be most helpful.”
Red flags and risk assessment
Assess and safety-net for:
These features should influence urgency, follow-up and crisis advice.
Decision points
Key decisions include:
Management priority
The management priority is to agree a compassionate, practical and personalised plan that addresses both:
Management options
1. Fit note and occupational management
A possible option is a two-week fit note with collaborative reassessment.
Discuss:
Avoid issuing a fit note without arranging review.
2. Talking therapies
Discuss:
Explain that talking therapy may help him process the breakup, manage low mood and develop coping strategies.
3. Lifestyle measures
Encourage realistic re-engagement with physical activity and structure, such as:
ETxercise has been shown to have a greater effect than many antidepressant medications. Present this positively without implying exercise is a substitute for all other support.
4. Sleep hygiene
Discuss:
5. Alcohol
Gently explore whether alcohol use has increased.
Discuss:
6. Online and self-help resources
Offer reliable resources such as:
7. Antidepressant medication
Consider antidepressants if symptoms persist or are severe.
Discuss:
Avoid presenting medication as the only option.
8. Social prescribing and community support
Consider signposting to:
This may help reduce isolation and support gradual reconnection with activities.
9. Occupational and workplace support
Explore support through:
A short fit note may be combined with a realistic plan for returning to work or reducing pressure.
Personalised plan
Use what James has shared to tailor the plan.
If he is wary of medication:
If work is the major pressure:
“Would it help to involve your line manager or see what support work can offer?”
If he has thought about safety:
“You’ve thought about safety — let’s add a crisis contact just in case.”
If he misses previous activities:
“You mentioned swimming and running used to matter to you. Would a very small first step back towards one of those feel possible, or does that feel too much right now?”
A personalised plan might include:
Shared decision-making
Ask James which options feel realistic and acceptable.
“How does that sound to you — do you think any of these options would work for you?”
“Does that explanation fit with your experiences?”
Discuss:
Safety-netting
Provide clear advice about seeking urgent help if:
Explain how to access urgent help and identify appropriate crisis contacts or emergency services. Arrange follow-up so that safety is reviewed rather than relying only on James to reattend if he deteriorates.
Documentation points
Document:
Common unsafe or weak management plans
Avoid:
Follow-up and coordination with other professionals
Arrange collaborative reassessment to review:
Coordinate with services where relevant:
Learner checkpoint
Have I created a plan that supports James emotionally, practically and occupationally — not just administratively?
Relevant guidance areas
NICE guidance
RCGP and SCA resources
Patient information websites
Relevant research or educational references
Additional support resources mentioned
Key principles to remember
Transferable learning for future cases
When a patient presents with a fit-note request linked to emotional distress:
Supervisor or examiner lens
A supervisor or examiner is likely to look for:
Limitations or ambiguities
Final learner takeaway
A fit-note request for low mood is an opportunity to assess distress, function and safety — and to build a recovery plan, not just complete paperwork.