Dizziness

start timer

ℹ️ This is the case information for the doctor.

Name

Alex Turner

Age

47 years old

Address

24 Letchworth Close

Social history

Occupation: Estate Agent,

Living situation: Married, 2 children

‍

Past history

Hypertension (diagnosed age 43, well-controlled)

Migraine (since twenties, infrequent episodes – every 2-3 months, usually with visual aura and bad headache, responsive to Sumatriptan)

No surgeries

Investigation results

Last bloods (routine hypertension review) 10 months ago – all normal.

BP at last check: 128/76.

‍

Medication

Amlodipine 5mg daily

Sumatriptan 50mg as needed for migraines (uses infrequently, last taken 2 months ago)

No allergies

‍

Booking note

Dizziness

ℹ️ This is the information for the person role playing the patient.

Case overview

Name

Alex Turner

Age

47 years old

Address

24 Letchworth Close

Social history

Occupation: Estate Agent,

Living situation: Married, 2 children

‍

Past history

Hypertension (diagnosed age 43, well-controlled)

Migraine (since twenties, infrequent episodes – every 2-3 months, usually with visual aura and bad headache, responsive to Sumatriptan)

No surgeries

Medication

Amlodipine 5mg daily

Sumatriptan 50mg as needed for migraines (uses infrequently, last taken 2 months ago)

No allergies

‍

Opening statement

“Hi doctor, I’ve just been feeling a bit off balance and dizzy?”

Information freely divulged

Felt lightheaded, dizzy, and a bit unsteady on and off for about 4 weeks.

Worse when getting up quickly, or moving around (e.g. coming down stairs, turning quickly).

Occasionally feels like the room is spinning very slightly for a few seconds, especially if he turns his head quickly or bends down.

‍

Information given on questioning

Further symptom details

The dizziness sometimes feels like the room is moving or spinning (“I suppose it is a bit like things are moving round, especially fast movements – is that vertigo?”)

No double vision, visual changes (other than usual migraine aura, which he hasn’t had during this time).

No weakness, numbness, or speech difficulties.

No chest pain, palpitations, shortness of breath, feeling faint, or loss of consciousness.

No trauma or hits to head/neck.

No recent foreign travel, tick bites, ear infections, or viral illnesses.

No feelings of low mood or panic attacks; occasionally feels “pretty stressed,” but doesn’t notice dizziness being worse when he’s stressed.

Has felt mildly nauseous but hasn’t vomited or needed time off work.

No hearing loss or buzzing in the ears.

No significant headaches – “just my usual migraine, which I haven’t had for two months.”

Still driving but being more careful.

Not fallen over, but does feel cautious.

Still able to work and look after himself/family.

‍

Medication/other potential causes

Not started any new meds; Amlodipine and Sumatriptan only.

No sedating medications or recreational drug use.

No excess caffeine.

‍

Ideas, Concerns, Expectations

Ideas:

Wonders if he has some kinf of infection or perhaps something more serious.

Concerns:

Worried it might be something serious in his brain ("like a tumour or stroke or something going on").

Mildly anxious as it’s been going on for a while with little improvement.

Heard about people his age having strokes, so that’s playing on his mind.

Family has suggested Meniere’s but he’s never had ear problems.

‍

Expectations:

Hopes for answers about what’s causing this.

Thinks he probably needs a scan to rule out something serious, “like a brain scan.”

Wants some advice about what he can do to feel more steady – "It’s just starting to affect my confidence when I’m out and about for work."

‍

Family History:

Father had hypertension, no neurological problems.

No known family history of stroke, MS, ear disease, or brain tumours.

‍

Behaviour

Demeanour:

Mildly anxious but polite, trustful of GP. Not acutely ill, just wants to be taken seriously.

‍

Symptoms:

Not obviously distressed, but gestures to head and steadiness if describing symptoms. If asked to clarify dizziness, will describe it as a “bit spinny” if prompted, but not dramatic.

‍

Response to Doctor:

If the doctor is empathic and explains that a firm diagnosis often needs further testing/examination, will be understanding but may check “so you really don’t think I need a scan yet?”

If told it is likely to be inner ear-related and needs a stepwise approach, will ask “Is it safe to keep driving / working?”

If the doctor is dismissive or suggests anxiety alone, may appear uncomfortable or ask more directly “but could it be something serious in my head?”

Will accept an offer for symptom relief (“am I ok to take something like that?”) but wishes to avoid drowsiness.

Will agree to further assessment/examination appointment and is reassured by a clear plan.

If reassured it is not likely a stroke or brain tumour, he will be relieved but may double-check “I just want to be sure we’re not missing something dangerous.”

‍

Additional cues:

If physical exam is deferred because it’s a video consult, will understand the limitations but expect a face-to-face soon if not improving.

Not interested in time off work, unless told is unsafe.

Will be grateful for clear safety-netting and written info.

‍

ℹ️ To mark data gathering & diagnosis select from the descriptors below.

Positive descriptors

Negative descriptors

Data gathering was systematic and targeted ensuring patient safety.

Elicits key information using by encouraging Alex to describe the symptoms in his own words before progressing to clarifying details about the dizziness (onset, duration, triggers).

Uses logical follow-up questions to clarify the temporal pattern, associated symptoms, and any factors that impact the dizziness severity.

Data gathering was incomplete, lacking structure and focus.

Fails to establish key details of the dizziness, such as when or how it started, or only asks closed or leading questions.

Does not clarify the quality of the dizziness, frequency, or context in which it occurs.

Makes effective use of existing information and considers the wider context.

Reviews Alex’s medical history (hypertension, migraine) and current medications, considering how these may relate to symptom development.

Explores lifestyle factors (occupation, alcohol intake, stress), linking them to possible causes or exacerbating factors.

Fails to use the information provided or understand the wider context.

Ignores or insufficiently explores Alex’s past history, migraine pattern, or antihypertensive medication as possible contributors.

Misses the opportunity to contextualise symptoms by asking about occupational, psychosocial, or lifestyle factors.

The presence or absence of relevant red flags was established.

Enquires about symptoms suggesting serious pathology: severe headache, sudden unilateral hearing loss, stroke features - weakness, speech changes, ataxia, or collapse.

Cardiac risk factors for stroke are considered - about chest pain, palpitations, smoking, atrial fibrillation).

Fails to assess key information necessary to determine risk.

Omits questions about neurological or systemic red flags, such as focal weakness, severe headache, or acute hearing loss.

Does not ask about symptoms that would prompt urgent referral or imaging.

Information gathered placed the problem in its psychosocial context.

Asks about the effect of symptoms on Alex’s work, driving, family life, and emotional wellbeing.

Explores work–life balance, stress, and any mood or anxiety symptoms, relating these to the dizziness.

The social and psychological impact of the problem was not adequately determined.

Does not enquire about how symptoms affect Alex’s daily living, work confidence, or quality of life.

Neglects psychological and social contributors or consequences of the dizziness.

A working diagnosis was reached using a structured, evidence-based approach.

Progressively narrows down causes by asking about classical features of vertigo, presyncope, and non-specific dizziness.

Considers medication effects, migraine, vestibular causes, and anxiety based on symptom quality and risk factors.

The evidence collected was inadequate to support the conclusions reached.

Jumps to conclusions without clarifying the vertiginous component or adequately excluding other causes.

Lacks a structured approach in synthesising the history to reach a logical diagnosis.

Uses an understanding of probability based on prevalence, incidence, and natural history to aid decision-making.

Assesses likely causes based on Alex’s demographic: vestibular causes and migraine are prioritised; rare or serious causes considered but reasonably deprioritised with no red flag features.

Considers how Alex’s hypertension and medications fit the pattern seen in primary care presentations.

Choice of diagnosis and/or investigations does not reflect disease likelihood.

Makes recommendations or suggests investigations (e.g. urgent scan) not supported by likelihood or risk profile.

Fails to place the most common diagnoses in the context of Alex’s symptoms and background.

ℹ️ To mark clinical management & medical complexity select from the descriptors below.

Positive descriptors

Negative descriptors

Practises holistically, promoting health, and safeguarding:

Links the episode to Alex’s well-controlled hypertension and past migraine history, explaining how these intersect.

Checks the impact on work, driving, and home life, offering advice on safe activity and when to avoid driving.

Fails to safeguard patient welfare:

Ignores impact on Alex’s safety in the community (e.g. driving) or does not account for effects on mental wellbeing.

Manages dizziness in isolation from underlying conditions, potentially overlooking broader health risks.

Manages uncertainty, including that experienced by the patient:

Transparently discusses diagnostic uncertainty and discusses the most likely causes for the symptom picture informed by disease prevalence and epidemiology.

Explains that immediate investigations (e.g. scan) are not needed without red flags, but outlines what would change that assessment.

Struggles with uncertainty, leading to inconsistent decisions:

Either over-investigates (ordering unnecessary scans) or under-explains the rationale for not providing a concrete diagnosis.

Provides vague or contradictory messages about next steps and symptom meaning.

Tailors management options responsively according to circumstances, priorities and preferences:

Involves Alex in decisions, considers his work needs (e.g. advice on driving), and addresses his worry about serious causes.

Adapts educational and symptomatic management advice to Alex’s expressed anxiety, family expectations, and occupational concerns.

Management options fail to adequately consider patient preference and circumstance:

Does not enquire about or respond to Alex’s concerns, priorities, or life context (e.g. just issues generic advice).

Rigidly dictates management without offering options or shared decision making.

Offers management options that are safe and appropriate:

Discusses stepwise approach: offers face-to-face appointment for targeted examination to manage uncertainty and identify likely diagnosis.

Offers symptom relief (e.g. short course of prochlorperazine) while awaiting review.

Fails to provide appropriate and or safe management choices:

Fails to recommend in-person examination, risking misdiagnosis or delayed recognition of serious pathology.

Ignores symptom relief, leaving Alex unsupported, or inappropriately suggests high-level investigations (e.g. head CT) without clinical justification.

Empowers self-care and independence:

Provides advice on minimising symptom triggers (e.g. taking care with sudden head movement, staying hydrated).

Explains warning signs for when to seek immediate help or re-consult, building confidence and autonomy.

‍

Management fails to foster self-care and patient involvement:

Omits advice on symptom management or fails to explain when and how Alex should escalate care.

Makes Alex dependent on the GP without offering practical steps to manage minor symptoms day to day.

Prescribes safely considering local and national guidance:

If prescribing for symptom relief, provides clear instructions, discusses potential side effects (e.g. sedation with prochlorperazine), and checks for contraindications.

Reviews Alex’s current medications and interactions before adding anything new.

Unsafe prescribing ignoring best practice:

Prescribes without checking for potential interactions, or withholds symptomatic relief when appropriate.

Offers drugs contra-indicated for patients with migraine or cardiovascular comorbidity.

ℹ️ To mark relating to others select from the descriptors below.

Positive descriptors

Negative descriptors

Shows ability to communicate in a person-centred way:

Acknowledges Alex’s anxiety about the dizziness and how it affects his work and daily activities.

Validates his concerns about possible serious causes and uncertainty about the diagnosis.

Communication is doctor-centred and lacks empathy:

Focuses only on medical questions and explanations, without recognising Alex’s distress or need for reassurance.

Does not acknowledge the impact of the symptoms or Alex’s fears about brain problems.

Treats patients fairly and with respect:

Listens attentively without making assumptions about the cause (e.g. not attributing symptoms to anxiety or stress without evidence).

Respects Alex’s concerns and need for investigation, discussing these sensitively and non-judgementally.

Decisions fail to prioritise the patient’s rights and interests:

Dismisses Alex’s request for further investigation or makes light of his worries.

Ignores Alex’s perspective regarding work or driving safety.

Explores the patient’s agenda, health beliefs and preferences:

Asks Alex directly what he thinks might be causing his dizziness and his expectations for management.

Recognises Alex’s belief that a scan may be necessary and his worries about strokes or tumours.

Fails to recognise thepatient's agenda and impact of the problem:

Does not ask about Alex’s own explanations for his symptoms or explore his wish for specific investigations.

Offers generic advice without addressing Alex’s stated hopes or fears.

Recognises what matters to the patient and works collaboratively to enhance patient care:

Involves Alex in decisions about the next steps (e.g. timing of examination, medication for symptom relief, discussion about escalation).

Acknowledges the importance of his work and family, adapting care to minimise disruption.

Fails to work with the patient to plan care:

Proposes a management plan without inviting Alex’s perspective or input.

Misses opportunities to reassure or partner with Alex in his care.

Demonstrates flexibility of communication adapting to the patient and scenario:

Adjusts explanation to Alex’slevel of understanding, using plain language about vertigo, balance and stepwise investigation.

Offers clarifications when Alex expresses confusion or concern, adapting explanations as needed.

Consults rigidly, providing generic explanations and management plans:

Uses jargon (“peripheral vestibulopathy,” “BPPV”) or fails to explain technical terms clearly.

Repeats the same explanation despite Alex’s queries or signs of confusion.

Takes ownership of decisions, whilst being aware of personal limitations:

Explains clearly that an in-person assessment is needed for examination, while taking responsibility for organising the next steps.

Acknowledges the limitations of video consulting in diagnosing neurological symptoms and arranges appropriate timely follow up.

Does not take ownership or show awareness of personal limitations:

Promises a diagnosis remotely or declines to arrange a timely review despite ongoing uncertainty or limitations in assessment.

Avoids clarifying own responsibility for follow up and managing Alex’s ongoing concerns.

ℹ️ Insights from the examiner

📝 Section 1: Case Overview and Consultation Priorities

Case at a glance

Alex is experiencing dizziness, sometimes described as a spinning sensation. His symptoms may be triggered by movement or turning his head.

The consultation is taking place remotely, so a firm diagnosis cannot be made without a face-to-face examination. The key task is to distinguish likely benign vestibular symptoms from less likely but serious neurological, cardiac or other causes.

 

GP trainee performance focus

A strong GP trainee should demonstrate the ability to:

  • Clarify what Alex means by “dizziness”.
  • Distinguish between vertigo, light-headedness, feeling faint, unsteadiness and imbalance.
  • Explore Alex’s fears about serious causes such as stroke, brain tumour or neurological disease.
  • Screen for neurological, auditory, visual and cardiac red flags.
  • Communicate diagnostic uncertainty safely in a remote consultation.
  • Explain why face-to-face examination is needed.
  • Offer appropriate symptom relief where clinically appropriate.
  • Give clear advice about driving, movement and safety.
  • Arrange follow-up and explicit safety-netting.

 

What this case is testing

  • Open questioning and agenda setting.
  • Clarifying symptom meaning rather than accepting “dizziness” at face value.
  • Recognition of red flags.
  • Remote consultation safety.
  • Explaining uncertainty and probability.
  • Patient-centred reassurance.
  • Practical advice about work, driving and activity.
  • Shared decision-making about assessment and symptom relief.

 

Patient priorities and concerns

Alex may be concerned that the dizziness is caused by:

  • A stroke.
  • A brain tumour.
  • Another serious neurological problem.

He may also want help with:

  • Understanding what the dizziness means.
  • Obtaining symptom relief.
  • Knowing whether he needs examination or further tests.
  • Staying safe while driving.
  • Continuing to work, including showing houses.
  • Understanding what symptoms should prompt urgent help.

 

Central challenge

The central challenge is to provide reassurance without dismissing Alex’s fear of serious disease, while being clear that a video consultation cannot replace a face-to-face examination.

The clinician needs to:

  • Clarify the nature of the dizziness.
  • Assess associated symptoms and red flags.
  • Explain the likely order of probability.
  • Arrange face-to-face assessment.
  • Offer appropriate symptom relief.
  • Give clear driving and safety advice.
  • Safety-net for neurological, auditory and deterioration symptoms.

 

Must-not-miss issue or diagnosis

The must-not-miss issue is a serious neurological, cardiac or other cause of dizziness being missed during a remote consultation.

Although the current information suggests no reported neurological red flags, the clinician should still assess for symptoms such as weakness, numbness, speech disturbance, visual disturbance, severe headache, fainting or chest pain.

 

Red flags or high-risk features

red flags include:

  • New neurological symptoms.
  • Sudden weakness or numbness.
  • Speech disturbance.
  • Visual disturbance.
  • Facial drooping.
  • Difficulty walking.
  • Loss of coordination.
  • Severe or sudden headache.
  • New hearing loss.
  • Sudden worsening.
  • Inability to walk safely.
  • Fainting or collapse.
  • Chest pain.
  • Palpitations or presyncopal symptoms.
  • Persistent vomiting.
  • Severe deterioration.

 

Common GP trainee pitfalls

  • Not clarifying what Alex means by dizziness.
  • Reassuring too early without red-flag screening.
  • Dismissing his fear of stroke or brain tumour.
  • Giving a firm diagnosis remotely without examination.
  • Forgetting auditory, neurological, visual and cardiac symptoms.
  • Not considering medication or blood pressure.
  • Omitting driving safety advice.
  • Prescribing symptom relief without discussing drowsiness.
  • Not arranging face-to-face assessment.
  • Giving vague safety-netting.

 

What good looks like

A strong consultation is structured, reassuring but honest. The trainee explores Alex’s symptoms and worries, explains the likely causes, acknowledges the limits of video assessment, and arranges a safe next step.

“From what you’ve described, this sounds most like a balance-system problem, but I can’t confirm that over video. I’d like to examine you face to face and make sure there are no signs of anything more serious.”

Learner checkpoint

Have I clarified the type of dizziness and explained why a face-to-face examination is needed?

‍

📝 Section 2: Patient-Centred Consultation and Data Gathering

Start with an open question

Begin by allowing Alex to describe the dizziness and his concerns.

“Can you tell me more about the dizziness and what has been worrying you?”

Then summarise his agenda:

“So the main problem is a spinning sensation when you move your head, and you’re worried it could be something serious. Is that right?”

 

Time-efficient data gathering

Clarify what Alex has already tried, including:

  • Over-the-counter medication.
  • Rest.
  • Avoiding particular movements.
  • Changes to food or drink.
  • Any self-management strategies.

Then focus on the key diagnostic distinction: what Alex means by “dizzy”.

Clarify whether he means:

  • Spinning sensation or vertigo.
  • Light-headedness.
  • Feeling faint.
  • Unsteadiness.
  • A sense of imbalance.
  • Difficulty walking.

High-yield questions

 

Nature and timing of dizziness

Ask:

  • “When did this start?”
  • “Was the onset sudden or gradual?”
  • “How long does each episode last?”
  • “Is it constant or does it come and go?”
  • “Is it triggered by turning your head or changing position?”
  • “Is it getting worse?”
  • “What makes it better or worse?”

 

Neurological symptoms

Ask about:

  • Numbness or weakness.
  • Speech disturbance.
  • Facial drooping.
  • Difficulty walking.
  • Loss of coordination.
  • Visual disturbance.
  • Severe or sudden headache.

 

Ear and hearing symptoms

Ask about:

  • Hearing loss.
  • Tinnitus.
  • Ear pain.
  • Ear discharge.
  • New hearing-related symptoms.

 

Cardiac or faintness symptoms

Ask about:

  • Palpitations.
  • Chest pain.
  • Presyncope.
  • Fainting.
  • Feeling light-headed on standing.

 

Other relevant history

Clarify:

  • Previous migraine.
  • Recent migraine symptoms.
  • Current medication, including amlodipine.
  • Blood-pressure problems.
  • Recent infections.
  • Previous episodes of vertigo.
  • Alcohol or substance use where relevant.

 

Functional, psychosocial or contextual assessment

Explore how dizziness affects Alex’s day-to-day life.

Ask:

“Is this stopping you from showing houses or making you nervous about driving?”

“How has it affected your confidence at work or at home?”

Explore:

  • Whether he has stopped driving.
  • Whether he feels unsafe driving.
  • Whether he has had to cancel work.
  • Whether he can walk safely.
  • Whether he avoids certain movements.
  • Whether anxiety is making symptoms harder to manage.

 

Explore ideas, concerns and expectations

Alex may be worried about serious brain disease. Explore this directly.

“You mentioned being worried about something like a stroke or tumour. Can you tell me more about that?”

Clarify whether his main goal is:

  • Reassurance.
  • Symptom relief.
  • A diagnosis.
  • Advice about work.
  • Advice about driving.
  • Assessment for serious causes.

 

Recognise and respond to cues

If Alex says:

“I’m just worried it’s something serious in my brain.”

Respond with acknowledgement before explanation:

“I can understand why that would worry you. Let’s go through the symptoms that would make us concerned about that, and then I’ll explain what seems most likely from what you’ve told me.”

If he appears frustrated by uncertainty:

“Not having a clear answer must be frustrating. We’re going to work together to get to the bottom of this.”

Do not dismiss his concerns simply because the likely cause may be benign.

 

Useful consultation phrases

“Many people notice a spinning feeling when moving or turning their head suddenly. Has this been your experience?”

“I can’t give a firm diagnosis over this video consultation because I need to examine you, but we can go through the most likely causes and arrange a face-to-face assessment.”

“The most common cause of a spinning feeling triggered by movement is a problem in the inner ear’s balance system.”

“There are no signs you’ve shared that suggest a serious cause, but I still want to examine you properly.”

“If you feel dizzy or unsteady, or if medication makes you drowsy, you should not drive.”

 

Consultation flow and signposting

  1. Establish Alex’s story and main worry.
  2. Clarify whether dizziness means spinning, light-headedness or unsteadiness.
  3. Ask about timing, triggers and progression.
  4. Screen for neurological, hearing, visual and cardiac symptoms.
  5. Review migraine history, medication and blood pressure context.
  6. Explore impact on work, driving and confidence.
  7. Explain likely causes and limits of remote assessment.
  8. Arrange face-to-face assessment.
  9. Discuss symptom relief and activity advice.
  10. Safety-net clearly.

Example signposting:

“Thanks, that helps me rule out some more serious causes. Does it also happen when you stand up, or mainly when you turn your head?”

 

Summarising and checking understanding

Summarise before management:

“From what you’ve described, the dizziness is mainly triggered by movement, without the neurological warning symptoms we’ve discussed. The likely causes are generally related to the balance system, but I’d like to examine you face to face.”

Check:

  • What Alex understands about the likely causes.
  • Whether he understands why examination is needed.
  • Whether he knows how to keep himself safe.
  • Whether he has further concerns about stroke or brain disease.

 

Data gathering self-check

Before moving to management, the trainee should know:

  • Whether Alex’s dizziness is vertigo, light-headedness, faintness or unsteadiness.
  • Onset, duration, triggers and progression.
  • Whether there are neurological, hearing, visual or cardiac symptoms.
  • Whether symptoms affect walking safety.
  • Whether symptoms affect driving or work.
  • Relevant migraine history.
  • Current medication, including amlodipine.
  • Blood pressure context.
  • What Alex has tried already.
  • What he is most worried about.

Assessment domain mapping

 

Data gathering

  • Nature of dizziness.
  • Timing, triggers and progression.
  • Neurological, auditory, visual and cardiac symptoms.
  • Migraine, medication and blood pressure history.
  • Impact on work, driving and function.

 

Clinical management

  • Explaining uncertainty in remote assessment.
  • Arranging face-to-face review.
  • Considering symptom relief.
  • Driving and movement safety advice.
  • Safety-netting for serious symptoms.

 

Relating to others

  • Acknowledging fear of serious disease.
  • Using Alex’s own language.
  • Avoiding false reassurance.
  • Shared planning around work and driving.

‍

📝 Section 3: Clinical Reasoning and Personalised Management

Prioritised differential diagnosis or clinical reasoning

Use Alex’s presentation to construct a prioritised differential:

  1. Benign vestibular dysfunction, such as viral labyrinthitis or vestibular neuritis — most likely if there is vertigo triggered by movement.
  2. Vestibular migraine, given the migraine background, although there have been no recent attacks.
  3. Orthostatic hypotension or medication side effect, including the possibility of an effect from amlodipine, although this is uncommon.
  4. Anxiety-related dizziness, given work stress, although this does not appear to be the dominant explanation.
  5. Cardiac causes, less likely in the absence of palpitations or presyncopal symptoms.
  6. Central causes, such as stroke, tumour or multiple sclerosis — very unlikely given the slow time course and absence of neurological red flags, but not dismissed without assessment.

 

Clinical reasoning script

“The pattern you describe — a spinning feeling triggered by head movement — most often comes from the balance system in the inner ear. Migraine or blood pressure can sometimes contribute. Serious brain causes seem less likely from what you’ve told me, but I still need to examine you face to face to be safe.”

 

Red flags and risk assessment

Arrange urgent assessment if Alex develops:

  • New weakness or numbness.
  • Difficulty speaking.
  • New visual symptoms.
  • Facial drooping.
  • Loss of coordination.
  • Difficulty walking.
  • Severe headache.
  • New hearing loss.
  • Sudden progression.
  • Collapse or fainting.
  • Chest pain.
  • Inability to walk safely.
  • Severe vomiting or deterioration.

 

Decision points

Key decisions include:

  • Is this vertigo, light-headedness, faintness or unsteadiness?
  • Are there neurological, auditory, visual or cardiac red flags?
  • Is face-to-face assessment needed?
  • Does Alex need symptom relief?
  • Is it safe for Alex to drive?
  • Could amlodipine or blood pressure be contributing?
  • Is symptom monitoring useful?
  • What follow-up is needed if symptoms persist or worsen?

 

Management priority

The management priority is to manage symptoms safely while arranging face-to-face assessment and ensuring Alex knows when to seek urgent help.

Management options

 

1. Face-to-face review

Arrange an appointment for physical examination and further assessment.

Explain that remote assessment can identify likely causes and red flags, but may not establish the diagnosis with certainty.

Face-to-face assessment may include:

  • Ear examination.
  • Neurological examination.
  • Gait and balance assessment.
  • Blood-pressure assessment, including consideration of postural readings.
  • Cardiovascular assessment.
  • Further examination based on symptoms.

 

2. Symptom relief

Consider symptom relief such as prochlorperazine where clinically appropriate.

Discuss:

  • Its intended role.
  • Possible drowsiness.
  • Effects on driving and operating machinery.
  • Need to review if symptoms persist or worsen.

 

3. Positioning and activity advice

Advise Alex to:

  • Stand up slowly.
  • Avoid sudden head movements.
  • Change position carefully.
  • Use support if unsteady.
  • Avoid walking in unsafe situations.
  • Sit or lie down if symptoms become severe.

 

4. Driving safety

Discuss driving safety explicitly.

Alex may need to avoid driving if:

  • He is dizzy or unsteady.
  • Medication causes drowsiness.
  • He cannot safely control the vehicle.
  • Symptoms occur unpredictably.

Advise him to seek further advice if symptoms affect his ability to drive safely.

 

5. Reassurance and education

Explain that serious causes appear less likely based on the information currently available, while being clear that examination is still required.

Discuss:

  • The likely role of the inner ear.
  • The relationship between movement and vertigo.
  • The possibility of migraine or blood pressure contributing.
  • Why imaging may not be necessary unless new concerning features appear.

 

6. Symptom monitoring

Encourage Alex to keep a symptom diary.

Record:

  • When dizziness occurs.
  • Type of dizziness.
  • Position or movement triggers.
  • Duration.
  • Food or dietary changes.
  • Sleep.
  • Stress.
  • Headache or migraine symptoms.
  • Hearing symptoms.
  • Medication timing.
  • Impact on work or driving.

This may help identify patterns, particularly in chronic vertigo or vestibular migraine.

 

7. Review blood-pressure treatment

Review hypertension management if:

  • Symptoms worsen when standing.
  • Alex feels faint.
  • Blood pressure is low.
  • There is a possible medication contribution.

Do not stop or change medication without appropriate clinical assessment.

 

Personalised plan

Adapt the plan to Alex’s work, driving and symptom severity.

A suitable personalised plan might include:

  • Face-to-face examination.
  • Short-term symptom relief if appropriate.
  • Advice about driving and sudden movements.
  • A symptom diary.
  • Review of blood pressure and medication.
  • Clear neurological and hearing-related safety-netting.
  • Follow-up if symptoms persist or worsen.

Example phrase:

“Because you’re still able to function and there are no warning signs, we can manage this step by step — symptom relief, a face-to-face check and holding off on scans unless new symptoms appear.”

 

Shared decision-making

Involve Alex in deciding:

  • How quickly he can attend a face-to-face assessment.
  • Whether he needs symptom relief.
  • How he will manage work and driving.
  • What activity modifications are realistic.
  • What symptoms would prompt urgent help.
  • Whether he would find a symptom diary useful.

Link the plan to his practical concerns:

“Would you like to talk about how you can manage this at work, and what to do if things get worse?”

Safety-netting

Alex should seek urgent help if he develops:

  • New weakness or numbness.
  • Difficulty speaking.
  • New visual symptoms.
  • Severe headache.
  • New hearing loss.
  • Sudden progression.
  • Collapse or fainting.
  • Chest pain.
  • Inability to walk safely.
  • Severe vomiting.
  • Marked deterioration.

Ensure he understands what to do and who to contact if these occur.

 

Documentation points

Document:

  • How Alex describes the dizziness.
  • Onset, duration, triggers and progression.
  • Associated neurological, auditory, visual and cardiac symptoms.
  • Migraine history.
  • Medication history, including amlodipine.
  • Impact on work and driving.
  • Remote consultation limitations explained.
  • Face-to-face assessment arranged.
  • Symptom relief discussed or prescribed.
  • Driving and activity advice.
  • Safety-netting advice.

 

Common unsafe management plans

Avoid:

  • Diagnosing definitively over video without examination.
  • Reassuring without asking about neurological symptoms.
  • Ignoring Alex’s concern about serious disease.
  • Prescribing prochlorperazine without discussing drowsiness and driving.
  • Not asking about hearing loss.
  • Not considering cardiac symptoms, blood pressure or medication.
  • Failing to arrange face-to-face review.
  • Giving no safety-netting for sudden deterioration.

 

Follow-up and coordination with other professionals

Arrange face-to-face review for examination and further assessment.

Follow-up should review:

  • Symptom progression.
  • Examination findings.
  • Response to symptom relief.
  • Work and driving safety.
  • Blood pressure and medication contribution if relevant.
  • Need for further assessment if symptoms persist or red flags develop.

Learner checkpoint

Have I made Alex safer today while acknowledging that the diagnosis needs examination to confirm?

‍

📝 Section 4: Key Guidance, Resources and References

Relevant guidance areas 

  • Vertigo and dizziness.
  • Prochlorperazine.
  • Communication in simulated consultations.

 

NICE guidance

  • NICE: Vertigo and dizziness.

 

BNF references

  • BNF: Prochlorperazine.

 

Relevant research or educational references

  • Simulated consultations: Sociolinguistic perspective.

 

Key principles to remember

  • Clarify what Alex means by “dizziness”.
  • Ask about vertigo, light-headedness and unsteadiness separately.
  • Explore hearing, neurological, visual and cardiac symptoms.
  • Acknowledge his fear of serious disease.
  • Explain likely causes in order of probability.
  • Be honest that a video consultation cannot provide a firm diagnosis.
  • Arrange face-to-face examination.
  • Discuss symptom relief and drowsiness.
  • Provide clear driving and positioning advice.
  • Consider blood pressure and medication effects.
  • Use a symptom diary where helpful.
  • Give explicit safety-netting for neurological symptoms, hearing loss and sudden deterioration.

 

Transferable learning for future cases

In remote consultations for dizziness:

  • Do not accept “dizzy” without clarifying what the patient means.
  • Reassurance is safest after red-flag screening.
  • Acknowledge serious fears before explaining likely benign causes.
  • Be explicit about the limits of remote assessment.
  • Arrange examination when diagnosis depends on physical findings.
  • Give practical advice about driving, work and falls risk.
  • Safety-net for neurological, hearing and cardiac symptoms.

 

Supervisor or examiner lens

A supervisor or examiner is likely to look for:

  • Clear differentiation between vertigo, presyncope and unsteadiness.
  • Direct exploration of Alex’s fear of stroke or tumour.
  • Red-flag screening.
  • Recognition that video consultation cannot confirm diagnosis.
  • Appropriate face-to-face assessment plan.
  • Safe discussion of prochlorperazine and drowsiness.
  • Driving and activity advice.
  • Specific safety-netting.

‍

Final learner takeaway

In dizziness, first define the symptom, then screen for red flags, explain uncertainty honestly, and arrange examination when remote assessment is not enough.

‍

Authoring credit:

Clinitalk team