ℹ️ This is the case information for the doctor.
Name
Sarah Williams
Age
50
Address
The Orchard House, Lower Green, Ashdown, GL10 2RW
Social history
Past history
Investigation results
From the A&E attendance 2 months ago:
Since then:
Cardiology clinic letter, Severnvale General Hospital (6 weeks ago)
Dear Dr,
Re: Mrs Sarah Williams, 50
Thank you for referring this lady from the Emergency Department. She has had two episodes of transient loss of consciousness, both while walking briskly uphill, about a month apart. No prodrome other than brief dizziness, no chest pain or palpitations. Her ECG in clinic was normal and I could not hear a murmur.
Impression: Exertional syncope. A structural or arrhythmic cardiac cause needs to be excluded.
Plan:
She has also been referred to the neurology first seizure clinic by the Emergency Department.
Yours sincerely,
Cardiology Registrar, for Consultant Cardiologist
Medication
Booking note
Video consultation. "Would like to discuss hospital results and when she can drive again."
ℹ️ This is the information for the person role playing the patient.
Name
Sarah Williams
Age
50
Address
The Orchard House, Lower Green, Ashdown, GL10 2RW
Social history
Past history
Medication
Hello doctor, I'm really hoping you can help. I'm desperate to find out what's going on with me. I've been waiting for my results and I'm getting nowhere ringing the hospital. I also want to ask when I can drive again, because not driving is affecting every part of my life.
Initial information given in response to a general opening question
Ideas, concerns and expectations
Symptoms
Lifestyle information
Family history information
None
Medical history information
Further symptom details
Details of the episodes (if asked):
Since the last episode (if asked):
Relevant risk factors and exclusions
Exercise (if asked about activity or exercise):
Driving (if asked):
Further medical history
Further family and social history
Further ideas, concerns and expectations
Information requiring sensitive or specific questioning
Initial disposition and manner
Emotional triggers and shifts
Response to clinical explanations
Response to clinical management and proposals
Key role-player instructions
ℹ️ To mark data gathering & diagnosis select from the descriptors below.
Positive descriptors
Negative descriptors
Data gathering was systematic and targeted ensuring patient safety:
Data gathering was incomplete, lacking structure and focus:
Makes effective use of existing information and considers the wider context:
Fails to use the information provided or understand the wider context:
The presence or absence of relevant red flags was established:
Fails to assess key information necessary to determine risk:
Information gathered placed the problem in its psychosocial context:
The social and psychological impact of the problem was not adequately determined:
Uses an understanding of probability based on prevalence, incidence, and natural history to aid decision-making:
Choice of diagnosis and or investigations does not reflect disease likelihood:
Revises hypotheses as necessary in light of additional information:
Rigid consulting with new information not adequately considered and integrated into the working diagnosis:
ℹ️ To mark clinical management & medical complexity select from the descriptors below.
Positive descriptors
Negative descriptors
Offers management options that are safe and appropriate:
Fails to provide appropriate and or safe management choices:
Continuity of care is prioritised:
Ongoing care is uncoordinated:
Refers appropriately being mindful of resource:
Sends patients for specialist input unnecessarily:
Practises holistically, promoting health, and safeguarding:
Fails to safeguard patient welfare:
Manages uncertainty, including that experienced by the patient:
Struggles with uncertainty, leading to inconsistent decisions:
Adapts thinking to overcome challenges, creating practical and effective solutions:
Fails to adjust thinking when faced with obstacles, leading to ineffective or impractical solutions:
ℹ️ To mark relating to others select from the descriptors below.
Positive descriptors
Negative descriptors
Shows ability to communicate in a person-centred way:
Communication is doctor centred and lacks empathy:
Shows understanding of medical-legal principles and regulatory standards:
Fails to give appropriate regard to key legal aspects of consulting:
Demonstrates an empathic approach, and a willingness to help and care for the patient:
Lacks empathy and fails to be recognise emotional cues:
Works collaboratively in a team showing respect for colleagues:
Fails to work effectively with team members to deliver optimal care:
Respectfully challenges unhelpful health beliefs or behaviours:
Fails to maintain a productive therapeutic relationship:
Takes ownership of decisions, whilst being aware of personal limitations:
Does not take ownership or show awareness of personal limitations:
ℹ️ Insights from the examiner
Case at a glance
Sarah is a 50-year-old senior manager living in a rural village. She has had two blackouts, both while walking fast uphill, three and two months ago. Her ECG and bloods were normal. Cardiology suspect a heart cause and have done an echo; neurology have done an EEG. Both results are outstanding, and she has had no reply from either department.
At the echo, the technician said "there might be a problem". She has stopped driving on hospital advice but has not told the DVLA. She is anxious, sleeping badly and feels isolated. Her job and her life depend on driving.
The GP is not expected to make the diagnosis. The task is to recognise the risk, take ownership of getting the results reviewed, give accurate driving advice, and support her while she waits.
GP trainee performance focus
A strong GP trainee should demonstrate the ability to:
What this case is testing
Patient priorities and concerns
Sarah wants:
She is frightened by the technician's comment, worried about her job and income, and her mood is suffering.
Central challenge
The central challenge is that the GP cannot give Sarah the two things she most wants: her results and permission to drive. The trainee has to turn this into a plan she can trust: what the doctor will do now, what she must do, and what happens next.
At the same time, the trainee must recognise that this is not just an administrative problem. Two blackouts during exertion, and a hint that the echo may be abnormal, mean the results need urgent attention. The trainee also has to give her an unwelcome message: she must tell the DVLA.
The trainee should avoid:
Must-not-miss issues
Red flags and high-risk features
Features that raise concern in this case:
Features to ask about:
When to seek urgent help:
Common GP trainee pitfalls
What good looks like
A strong trainee acknowledges Sarah's frustration early, uses the cardiology letter, and quickly establishes that both blackouts happened on exertion. They ask about cardiac symptoms, family history and the technician's comment, and find out she has not told the DVLA. They take ownership: they will send an urgent advice and guidance request to cardiology and contact her when the reply comes back, usually within a couple of days. They explain clearly and kindly about driving and the DVLA, advise her to keep avoiding strenuous exercise, answer her question about private care honestly, offer practical support and continuity, respond to her mood, and check she has understood.
"I can hear how frustrating this has been. I can't give you the results today, but I can take this on. I'll send an urgent request to the cardiology team today. They usually reply within a couple of days, and I'll contact you myself as soon as I hear."
Learner checkpoint
Have I recognised the risk behind this request, and does Sarah leave knowing what I will do, when she will hear back, and what she must do herself?
Start with an open question
Acknowledge her frustration, then let her tell her story:
"It sounds like you've had a really difficult few months. Can you tell me what's been happening, from the start?"
Let her speak without interruption. She is organised and articulate, and much of the history will come out if given space.
Time-efficient data gathering
The notes and the cardiology letter cover the normal ECG and bloods, the outstanding echo and EEG, the planned exercise test and the advice not to drive. Use them, and focus on:
High-yield questions
The episodes
Red flags
Results
Driving
Work and money
Ideas, concerns and expectations
Functional, psychosocial or contextual assessment
Explore:
Explore ideas, concerns and expectations
Sarah's ideas:
Sarah's concerns:
Sarah's expectations:
Recognise and respond to cues
Cues include:
A strong response:
"You said your mental health is taking a battering. That's a lot to carry on top of everything else. Can you tell me a bit more about how you've been feeling?"
Useful consultation phrases
Consultation flow and signposting
Summarising and checking understanding
"So, you've had two blackouts, both walking uphill, and you've had tests with the heart and brain teams but no results. The technician said there might be a problem, and that's really worrying you. You haven't driven since, it's affecting your job and your mood, and you want someone to take charge of this. Is that right?"
At the end:
"We've covered a lot. Can you tell me what I'm going to do, and what you're going to do about driving and the DVLA?"
Data gathering self-check
Before moving to management, the trainee should know:
Assessment domain mapping
Data gathering
Clinical management
Relating to others
Prioritised clinical reasoning
Most blackouts are simple faints. Blackouts that happen during exertion are different: they raise the possibility of a structural heart problem or a heart rhythm problem, which carry a risk of further blackouts and serious harm. This is why cardiology have prioritised an echo and plan an exercise test.
Sarah's episodes have no features that suggest a seizure: no tongue biting, incontinence or confusion afterwards. The neurology tests are still worth chasing, but the cardiac result is the priority.
The likely causes, in order of concern:
The GP's reasoning task is not to make the diagnosis. It is to recognise the risk, make sure the right person sees the echo result quickly, and keep Sarah safe in the meantime.
Clinical reasoning script
"Most blackouts are simple faints, but when they happen during exercise we take them more seriously, because sometimes the heart is involved. That's why the heart team want to see your scan results. I can't say whether the technician's comment means anything, but I don't want you to be left waiting, so I'll ask the team for an urgent opinion today. Until we know more, it's safest not to drive and to avoid strenuous exercise."
Decision points
Management priority
The main management priorities are:
Management options
1. Chasing the results
2. Exercise
3. Driving
4. Private care
5. Work, transport and money
6. Mood and support
7. Continuity
Personalised plan
Sarah's plan should take into account:
For example:
Shared decision-making
The trainee should involve Sarah in:
Some points are not negotiable: not driving, telling the DVLA and avoiding strenuous exercise. The trainee should explain these clearly, with reasons, while respecting her feelings about them.
Safety-netting
Sarah should know:
Ethical, legal and safeguarding considerations
Driving
Insurance
Confidentiality
Documentation points
Document:
Common unsafe management plans
Follow-up and coordination with other professionals
Learner checkpoint
Have I made sure the echo will be seen quickly, and kept Sarah safe on exercise and driving while she waits?
Relevant guidance areas
NICE guidance
GMC, DVLA or safeguarding guidance
RCGP and SCA resources
Patient information websites
Relevant research or educational references
Key principles to remember
Transferable learning for future cases
When a patient asks you to chase results:
Supervisor or examiner lens
An examiner is likely to look for:
Final learner takeaway
When a patient asks you to chase results, ask why the test was done: two blackouts on exertion and a worrying comment at the echo make this a safety problem, not an admin one.