ℹ️ This is the case information for the doctor.
Name
Ilyas Kassi
Age
39 years
Address
23 Rosebank Avenue, Leicester
Social history
Past history
Investigation results
None
Medication
None
Booking note
Saw the nurse last week for a new patient check, asked to come back to discuss smoking cessation.
ℹ️ This is the information for the person role playing the patient.
Name
Ilyas Kassi
Age
39 years
Address
23 Rosebank Avenue, Leicester
Social history
Past history
Medication
None
“I saw the nurse last week for a new patient check and she says I really must stop smoking.”
Information given in response to questions or when good rapport is established
a) Details about the presenting problem and its context:
b) Ideas, concerns, expectations, family history:
Ideas:
Concerns:
Expectations:
Family history:
Social details:
ℹ️ To mark data gathering & diagnosis select from the descriptors below.
Positive descriptors
Negative descriptors
Data gathering was systematic and targeted ensuring patient safety.
Data gathering was incomplete, lacking structure and focus.
Makes effective use of existing information and considers the wider context.
Fails to use the information provided or understand the wider context.
The presence or absence of relevant red flags was established.
Fails to assess key information necessary to determine risk.
Information gathered placed the problem in its psychosocial context.
The social and psychological impact of the problem was not adequately determined.
A working diagnosis was reached using a structured, evidence based approach.
The evidence collected was inadequate to support the conclusions reached.
Relevant information was collected to place the undifferentiated problem in context and an appropriate differential diagnosis generated.
Inadequate information was collected to determine the likely cause of symptoms.
ℹ️ To mark clinical management & medical complexity select from the descriptors below.
Positive descriptors
Negative descriptors
Offers management options that are safe and appropriate:
Fails to provide appropriate and/or safe management choices:
Continuity of care is prioritised:
Ongoing care is uncoordinated:
Empowers self care and independence:
Management fails to foster self care and patient involvement:
Prescribes safely considering local and national guidance:
Unsafe prescribing ignoring best practice:
Refers appropriately being mindful of resource:
Sends patients for specialist input unnecessarily:
Arranges appropriate follow-up:
Unclear or inadequate follow-up:
ℹ️ To mark relating to others select from the descriptors below.
Positive descriptors
Negative descriptors
Shows ability to communicate in a person-centred way:
• Actively acknowledges Ilyas’s desire to quit smoking and respects his request for practical help rather than a lecture.
• Adjusts tone and language to foster a non-judgmental, supportive atmosphere, validating his efforts and emotions throughout the conversation.
Communication is doctor-centred and lacks empathy:
• Focuses on delivering didactic advice about the dangers of smoking without considering Ilyas’s personal context.
• Ignores Ilyas’s need for practical assistance, fails to respond to his emotional cues, or becomes paternalistic or critical.
Treats patients fairly and with respect:
• Demonstrates respect for Ilyas’s autonomy and life choices, avoiding judgement about his past smoking or previous failed attempts.
• Adopts a collaborative approach, considering Ilyas’s preferences and circumstances (e.g., his work, home life, relationships).
Decisions fail to prioritise the patient’s rights and interests:
• Uses disapproving language or stereotypes smokers.
• Pressures Ilyas into treatments or programmes he clearly declines, disregarding his personal values and choices.
Shows understanding of medical-legal principles and regulatory standards:
• Ensures Ilyas receives clear information about stop-smoking treatments, their risks, side-effects, and alternative strategies, supporting informed choice.
• Maintains sensitiveity and respects Ilyas’s right to choose (or refuse) interventions.
Fails to give appropriate regard to key legal aspects of consulting:
• Omits information required for informed consent regarding nicotine replacement or fails to check understanding.
• Discusses Ilyas’s smoking in a way that does not respect patient choice.
Explores the patient’s agenda, health beliefs and preferences:
• Elicits Ilyas’s motivations, concerns, and previous experiences around quitting, including emotional and practical barriers.
• Asks about preferences for methods of support, coping strategies, and desired pace or timing for quitting.
Fails to recognise the patient's agenda and impact of the problem:
• Ignores Ilyas’s preferred method (e.g., patches over medication) or does not ask about previous difficulties/quitting attempts.
• Fails to explore the challenges posed by Ilyas’s social environment (friends/co-workers who smoke).
Recognises what matters to the patient and works collaboratively to enhance patient care:
• Works in partnership to agree on a plan that fits Ilyas’s goals (e.g., using patches, avoiding group support), scheduling appropriate follow-up.
• Responds adaptively to cues about Ilyas’s social life, relationships, and recent motivations (mother’s success, new girlfriend).
Fails to work with the patient to plan care:
• Recommends only group-based support or smoking clinics, disregarding Ilyas’s wishes.
• Pushes a rigid plan without negotiating or checking agreement.
Demonstrates flexibility of communication adapting to the patient and scenario:
• Adjusts explanations for stop-smoking aids to match Ilyas’s practical needs at work and home, checking understanding.
• Offers a range of options and adapts to Ilyas’s responses during the discussion.
Consults rigidly, providing generic explanations and management plans:
• Uses medical jargon or offers a fixed script not tailored to Ilyas’s work/life circumstances.
• Fails to clarify or adapt when Ilyas expresses uncertainty or asks for alternatives.
ℹ️ Insights from the examiner
Case at a glance
Ilyas is considering trying to stop smoking again. He may feel ambivalent because he enjoys smoking, uses cigarettes to cope with stress, and expects to become irritable if he stops.
The consultation should establish his motivation, previous quit attempts, smoking triggers and expectations, then agree a realistic smoking cessation plan. This may include nicotine replacement, medication, behavioural support, written resources and follow-up.
GP trainee performance focus
A strong GP trainee should demonstrate the ability to:
What this case is testing
Patient priorities and concerns
Ilyas’ priorities may include:
Central challenge
The central challenge is to support Ilyas’ motivation while recognising his ambivalence.
He may:
The trainee should avoid being judgemental or pushing a cessation method that does not fit Ilyas’ preferences.
Common GP trainee pitfalls
What good looks like
A strong consultation is collaborative, practical and positive. The trainee helps Ilyas understand his smoking pattern, identifies barriers, explains options, and supports a plan that feels realistic.
“You’ve tried before, so we can use what you learned from that. Let’s look at what made it difficult last time and what support would make this attempt more manageable.”
Learner checkpoint
Have I explored both sides of Ilyas’ ambivalence: what he gets from smoking and what he hopes to gain by stopping?
Start with an open question
Confirm the reason for attendance before assuming Ilyas is ready to stop.
“It says in your notes that you’re interested in some help to stop smoking. Is that what you wanted to talk about today?”
This works well because it:
Then use an open question to explore motivation:
“Can you tell me what made you decide to give stopping smoking another try?”
Time-efficient data gathering
Use open questions first, then targeted questions to fill gaps. Avoid turning the consultation into a long checklist.
Key areas to clarify include:
TThe bulk of marks is in clinical management, so aim to move on from data gathering by around 6–7 minutes.
High-yield questions
Agenda and motivation
Smoking pattern and dependence
Previous attempts
Triggers and barriers
Support and preferences
Functional, psychosocial or contextual assessment
Smoking cessation planning should be grounded in Ilyas’ real life. Explore:
Explore ideas, concerns and expectations
Ilyas may believe smoking helps him cope and may expect to become irritable if he stops. Explore this explicitly.
“What do you feel smoking does for you at the moment?”
“You mentioned you get ratty when you try to stop. What worries you about not smoking?”
Also clarify expectations:
Recognise and respond to cues
Important cues include:
Respond by validating and exploring:
“It sounds like smoking has been doing a few different jobs for you — helping with stress, fitting into work breaks, and being something you enjoy. If we’re going to make a plan, we need to take those things seriously.”
Avoid responding as though Ilyas is simply unmotivated.
Useful consultation phrases
“Lots of people feel smoking helps them cope, but there are ways of getting through the cravings. I can explain these, if you like?”
“Nicotine patches can really cut down cravings and help your mood while you stop.”
“Previous attempts aren’t failures — they tell us what gets in the way and what we need to plan for.”
“Would working towards a quit date be more likely to help you stick to quitting? How would you feel about that?”
“You’re the expert on when you smoke most. Let’s build the plan around those high-risk times.”
Consultation flow and signposting
Use signposting to keep the consultation structured:
“We’ve talked about what makes smoking difficult to stop. Next, I’d like to go through the options that can reduce cravings and make the plan more realistic.”
Summarising and checking understanding
Before moving into management, summarise Ilyas’ situation.
“You’ve tried to stop before, but cravings and feeling irritable made it difficult. You’re now thinking about trying again, particularly because of your cough, the cost and the support you have at home.”
Check confidence and understanding:
“Does this sound like it could work for you?”
“What questions do you have?”
“How confident do you feel about trying this plan?”
Data gathering self-check
Before agreeing a plan, the trainee should know:
Assessment domain mapping
Data gathering
Clinical management
Relating to others
Prioritised differential diagnosis or clinical reasoning
This is not primarily a diagnostic case. The main clinical focus is smoking cessation and nicotine dependence.
Consider:
Do not become distracted from the main agenda by investigating every possible smoking-related illness unless symptoms indicate this is necessary.
Clinical reasoning script
“You’ve tried to quit on your own before, but cravings and irritability made it hard. Using nicotine replacement or medication, plus some support, can make stopping more achievable. We can build the plan around your work triggers, your friends, and the type of support you’d actually use.”
This frames previous attempts as useful learning, not failure.
Red flags and risk assessment
Consider areas that may affect the safety and success of the plan:
Decision points
Key decisions include:
Management priority
The management priority is to agree a realistic, personalised smoking cessation plan that addresses:
Management options
1. Nicotine replacement therapy
Discuss options including:
Patches may be useful for providing steady nicotine levels and reducing cravings.
2. Medication
Discuss medication options such as:
Explain the purpose, potential benefits, side effects and any monitoring or prescribing considerations.
3. Exercise and distraction
Suggest practical craving-management strategies:
4. Set a clear quit date
Encourage a clear quit date where this suits Ilyas.
Discuss:
5. Follow-up
Arrange brief, regular follow-up to:
6. Written resources
Offer:
7. Avoidance of social triggers
Explore ways to reduce exposure to triggers such as:
Help Ilyas plan what he will say or do if offered a cigarette.
8. Family and friend support
Explore support from:
Ask whether he would like family members involved in supporting his quit attempt.
9. Stress management
Consider:
10. Group or specialist support
Mention group or specialist smoking cessation services, while respecting Ilyas’ preferences if he does not want group work.
Explain that support can be adapted to his preferred format.
Abrupt versus gradual reduction
STtopping abruptly may be more effective than gradual reduction according to NICE NG92, while still supporting Ilyas’ preference and readiness.
The trainee should offer evidence-based advice without dismissing Ilyas’ preferred approach.
“The guidance suggests stopping completely from a quit date can work better than gradually cutting down, but the plan still needs to feel realistic for you. Let’s talk about what you’d be willing to try.”
Personalised plan
A bespoke plan might include:
Example personalised plan:
“You’re most comfortable with patches and not group work, and you feel ready to set a quit date. Shall we prescribe patches, give you some information and arrange to touch base in a week?”
Shared decision-making
Discuss which options Ilyas feels are most acceptable and realistic.
Explore:
Use a positive frame:
“You’ve already made good progress thinking about this, and you’ve got support at home — which gives you a much better chance of success.”
Safety-netting and relapse planning
Explain that difficulty or relapse does not mean future attempts will fail.
Encourage Ilyas to:
Example phrase:
“If you have a cigarette after the quit date, it doesn’t mean the attempt has failed. Let’s use it to work out what triggered it and adjust the plan.”
Documentation points
Document:
Common unsafe or weak management plans
Avoid:
Follow-up and coordination with other professionals
Arrange brief, regular follow-up to monitor progress, reinforce motivation and adjust the plan if needed.
Where acceptable to Ilyas, consider:
Learner checkpoint
Have I agreed a plan that Ilyas feels able to follow when cravings, stress and social triggers appear?
Relevant guidance areas
This includes guidance and resources on:
NICE guidance
RCGP and SCA resources
Patient information websites
This includes:
Key principles to remember
Transferable learning for future cases
In behaviour change consultations, the task is not simply to give advice. A strong GP trainee should:
Supervisor or examiner lens
A supervisor or examiner is likely to look for:
Final learner takeaway
Smoking cessation consultations work best when you explore ambivalence, personalise support, and turn previous attempts into a practical plan for the next quit attempt.