ℹ️ This is the case information for the doctor.
Name
Gladys Rooney
Age
79 years old
Address
24 Oakdene Avenue, Wythenshawe, Manchester
Social history
Past history
Investigation results
Medication
Booking note
Call from paramedic.

ℹ️ This is the information for the person role playing the patient.
Name
Gladys Rooney
Age
79 years old
Address
24 Oakdene Avenue, Wythenshawe, Manchester
Social history
Past history
Medication
Hi doctor, thanks for getting back to me. I’m James, the paramedic with Gladys Rooney. We came after her husband rang 111 because she was very breathless today. She’s not keen on going in to hospital, so I wanted your advice.
Observations
Details of Presenting Problem
Ideas
The paramedic and family are unsure of the cause of the deterioration and want advice.
Concerns
Expectations
Paramedic:
How to give cues/reactions:
Key points for candidate:
ℹ️ To mark data gathering & diagnosis select from the descriptors below.
Positive descriptors
Negative descriptors
Makes effective use of existing information and considers the wider context.
Fails to use the information provided or understand the wider context.
The presence or absence of relevant red flags was established.
Fails to assess key information necessary to determine risk.
Information gathered placed the problem in its psychosocial context.
The social and psychological impact of the problem was not adequately determined.
Relevant information was collected to place the undifferentiated problem in context and an appropriate differential diagnosis generated.
Inadequate information was collected to determine the likely cause of symptoms.
Uses an understanding of probability based on prevalence, incidence, and natural history to aid decision-making.
Choice of diagnosis and/or investigations does not reflect disease likelihood.
Revises hypotheses as necessary in light of additional information.
Rigid consulting with new information not adequately considered and integrated into the working diagnosis.
ℹ️ To mark clinical management & medical complexity select from the descriptors below.
Positive descriptors
Negative descriptors
Offers management options that are safe and appropriate:
Fails to provide appropriate and/or safe management choices:
Continuity of care is prioritised:
Ongoing care is uncoordinated:
Empowers self care and independence:
Management fails to foster self care and patient involvement:
Prescribes safely considering local and national guidance:
Unsafe prescribing ignoring best practice:
Practises holistically, promoting health, and safeguarding:
Fails to safeguard patient welfare:
Manages uncertainty, including that experienced by the patient:
Manages uncertainty, including that experienced by the patient:
ℹ️ To mark relating to others select from the descriptors below.
Positive descriptors
Negative descriptors
Shows ability to communicate in a person-centred way:
Communication is doctor-centred and lacks empathy:
Shows understanding of medical-legal principles and regulatory standards:
Fails to give appropriate regard to key legal aspects of consulting:
Explores the patient’s agenda, health beliefs and preferences:
Fails to recognise the patient's agenda and impact of the problem:
Demonstrates flexibility of communication adapting to the patient and scenario:
Consults rigidly, providing generic explanations and management plans:
Works collaboratively in a team showing respect for colleagues:
Fails to work effectively with team members to deliver optimal care:
Checks the paramedics understanding of the consultation including any agreed plans:
Does not seek to confirm understanding:
ℹ️ Insights from the examiner
Case at a glance
Gladys Rooney is an elderly patient being discussed via a third-party call from a paramedic. She is breathless, has swelling, and may be experiencing acute on chronic heart failure. She may wish to avoid hospital, possibly because of a previous negative hospital experience.
The consultation requires rapid, structured information gathering from the paramedic, clear clinical reasoning, and a risk-managed plan that considers Gladys, her husband, family support, community services and the paramedic’s professional assessment.
GP trainee performance focus
A strong GP trainee should demonstrate the ability to:
What this case is testing
Patient and family priorities and concerns
Gladys and her family may prioritise:
Central challenge
The central challenge is balancing home-based management with the risk of deterioration.
The clinician must consider:
Must-not-miss issue or diagnosis
The must-not-miss issue is an elderly breathless patient deteriorating at home without adequate monitoring or escalation.
The likely working diagnosis is acute on chronic heart failure, but other causes such as infection, pulmonary embolism, anaemia, acute coronary syndrome, arrhythmia, acute kidney injury or metabolic causes should be considered where clinically supported.
Red flags or high-risk features
High-risk features include:
Common GP trainee pitfalls
What good looks like
A strong consultation is collaborative, focused and risk-aware. The trainee works with the paramedic, shares reasoning clearly, respects Gladys’ preferences, and arranges a home plan only if monitoring and support are adequate.
“It sounds like she’s really struggling today, and it makes sense she might feel scared about going into hospital. Let’s think this through together and work out whether home management can be made safe.”
Learner checkpoint
Have I made a plan that is safe for Gladys, realistic for her husband, and clear for the paramedic and community team?
Start with an open question
Start broadly with the paramedic to obtain a professional overview.
“Can you talk me through what has been happening with Gladys today and any observations you have recorded?”
This allows the paramedic to summarise the clinical picture before you fill gaps with targeted questions.
Time-efficient data gathering
Aim to complete core data gathering by around 6 minutes, so there is enough time for management.
Clarify what the paramedic has already checked:
Then focus on missing information needed for risk assessment.
High-yield questions
Breathlessness and heart failure features
Alternative causes and red flags
Current observations and examination
Baseline and function
Home safety and support
Functional, psychosocial or contextual assessment
Assess the practical safety of staying at home.
Explore:
Explore ideas, concerns and expectations
In a third-party call, the “others” include Gladys, her husband, family and the paramedic.
Clarify:
Recognise and respond to cues
Important cues include:
Respond collaboratively:
“I agree with you that infection is one possible cause. Her swelling and breathing pattern also make me think about her heart working less well.”
“Let’s think this through together.”
Useful consultation phrases
“Her symptoms sound most like a flare of heart failure, which means fluid is building up in her legs and lungs and making her breathless.”
“The usual first step is a water tablet, but she’ll need close monitoring because of her blood pressure and other health problems.”
“I’m a little worried about her low blood pressure. Furosemide could help, but we have to be cautious.”
“It’s a tough balance — her blood pressure is a little low, so a water tablet could lower it more, but with careful monitoring at home, it may be a reasonable option if we all work together.”
Consultation flow and signposting
Summarising and checking understanding
Summarise to the paramedic before finalising the plan.
“So Gladys has worsening breathlessness with swelling and no clear fever, cough or chest pain. Heart failure seems most likely, but her blood pressure is a caution. She wants to avoid hospital, and her husband may need support. We need a home plan only if monitoring and escalation are clear.”
Check:
Data gathering self-check
Before agreeing management, the trainee should know:
Assessment domain mapping
Data gathering
Clinical management
Relating to others
Prioritised differential diagnosis or clinical reasoning
A clearly prioritised differential includes:
Clinical reasoning script
“I’m thinking heart failure mainly, rather than infection. She’s at higher risk because of her heart history and swelling. The borderline blood pressure makes treatment more delicate, so if we manage her at home, monitoring needs to be active and reliable.”
Red flags and risk assessment
Assess whether home management is safe by considering:
If risk feels high or uncertain, arrange urgent reassessment, senior review or hospital admission depending on clinical judgement and available pathways.
Decision points
Key decisions include:
Management priority
The management priority is to relieve likely heart-failure symptoms while keeping Gladys safe and supported at home, if that is clinically appropriate and consistent with her wishes.
If home management is chosen, it must include:
Management options
1. Low-dose furosemide if safe
Consider starting low-dose furosemide if clinically safe.
Typical dosing is 20–40 mg, not 15 mg.
Discuss caution because of borderline or low blood pressure:
“Furosemide could help remove excess fluid, but because her blood pressure is on the low side, we need to monitor carefully.”
2. Community follow-up within 24 hours
Arrange district nurse, rapid access community team or other community follow-up within 24 hours for:
3. Safety-netting
Agree what to do if:
4. Practical equipment and falls-risk reduction
Consider:
5. Carer support
Consider:
6. Admission red lines
Discuss and document the thresholds for hospital admission, where this aligns with Gladys’ wishes.
Examples include:
7. Advance care planning and RESPECT
Consider advance care planning or a RESPECT form where appropriate.
8. Family involvement
Consider contacting her son and asking whether he can stay overnight.
9. Antibiotics if requested
If antibiotics are requested, explain that current evidence does not strongly support infection unless there are clear clinical signs.
Use a concise explanation:
“At the moment the signs point more towards fluid overload than infection. Antibiotics are most helpful when there are clear signs of infection, and unnecessary antibiotics can cause harm and resistance.”
Personalised plan
A bespoke plan might be:
“Given she wants to stay home and it seems safe for now, let’s start a gentle diuretic while arranging daily community support and keeping her care needs under active review. We’ll ensure her son knows and can help, and check that her husband feels able to manage.”
If risk feels higher:
“If you’re worried about her safety or there’s any doubt, it would be reasonable for me or a senior colleague to visit later today, and please call back if anything changes.”
Shared decision-making
Shared decision-making in this case involves:
Clarify:
Safety-netting
Safety-netting must be specific and clearly communicated to the paramedic and family.
Seek urgent help or reconsider admission if:
Confirm who will be contacted and how.
Ethical, legal and safeguarding considerations
Include where relevant:
If home management is chosen despite risk, document the reasoning, support arrangements and escalation plan.
Documentation points
Document:
Common unsafe management plans
Avoid:
Follow-up and coordination with other professionals
Coordinate with:
Follow-up should review:
Learner checkpoint
Have I explicitly balanced Gladys’ wish to stay home against the clinical risks and the support available today?
Relevant guidance areas
NICE guidance
BNF references
RCGP and SCA resources
Relevant research or educational references
Key principles to remember
Transferable learning for future cases
In third-party urgent care calls:
Supervisor or examiner lens
A supervisor or examiner is likely to look for:
Final learner takeaway
In third-party calls about frail breathless patients, safe home management depends on shared reasoning, reliable monitoring, carer capacity and explicit escalation plans.